Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hans U. Koller

dblp:272/4482 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1975
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video coding · 94% Multimedia systems and quality of experience · 6%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video coding
bit-plane coding
0.011975
Coding of Multilevel Graphics · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1975
Image and video coding
graphics coding
0.011975
Coding of Multilevel Graphics · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1975
Image and video coding
image compression
0.011975
Coding of Multilevel Graphics · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1975
Image and video coding › lossless compression
run-length coding
0.011975
Coding of Multilevel Graphics · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1975
Image and video coding
image quality assessment
0.011975
Coding of Multilevel Graphics · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1975
Multimedia systems and quality of experience
subjective quality assessment
0.011975
Coding of Multilevel Graphics · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1975

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

subjective testing · 0.0bit-plane run length coding · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1975 Coding of Multilevel Graphics
abstract
In this paper we consider the digitization and coding of graphics, specifically typewritten letters, and make two contributions. The first contribution concerns the tradeoff between resolution and number of gray levels. We carried out subjective tests which showed that, in order to get better image quality at a given bit rate, for good-quality originals, one should use only two levels/sample and higher resolution; while for poor-quality originals, one should use more levels/sample. Second, we estimated the bit rates achievable when bit-plane run length coding is applied to the multilevel images.
Thomas S. Huang, Hans U. Koller
IEEE Trans. Commun.2