Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Koho Ozone

dblp:272/4801 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1975
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Coding theory · 100%
Computer networks
1 paper
Physical-layer communications · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Physical-layer communications › digital transmission systems › wireline communication
voiceband modem
0.011975
Voice-Band Data Modem Performance Over Companded Delta Modulation Channels · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1975
Coding theory › source coding › predictive coding
delta modulation
0.011975
Voice-Band Data Modem Performance Over Companded Delta Modulation Channels · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1975
Coding theory
source coding
0.011975
Voice-Band Data Modem Performance Over Companded Delta Modulation Channels · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1975

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pulse code modulation · 0.0companded delta modulation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1975 Voice-Band Data Modem Performance Over Companded Delta Modulation Channels
abstract
This paper reports upon the results of tests of the transmission of data over single- and multiple-hop companded delta modulation (DM) systems. The DM coder-decoder (CODEC) was optimized for voice transmission. Modem bit error rate (BER) achievable over the range of 1200-9600 bits/s is presented. A comparison with the performance of pulse code modulation (PCM) is included. The comparison indicates that the two systems are comparable for error-free digital lines but favors the DM system for lines with errors.
Peter J. May, Carl J. Zarcone, Koho Ozone
IEEE Trans. Commun.3