Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Caldwell McCoy Jr.
dblp:272/6003
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1976
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Routing and switching · 78% Network performance modeling · 22% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Routing and switching
adaptive routing |
0.0 | 1 | 1976 | Effects of a Priority Discipline in Routing for Packet-Switched Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1976 |
Network performance modeling › queueing analysis
message delay |
0.0 | 1 | 1976 | Effects of a Priority Discipline in Routing for Packet-Switched Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1976 |
Routing and switching › packet switching
packet-switched networks |
0.0 | 1 | 1976 | Effects of a Priority Discipline in Routing for Packet-Switched Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1976 |
Routing and switching › service disciplines
priority discipline |
0.0 | 1 | 1976 | Effects of a Priority Discipline in Routing for Packet-Switched Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1976 |
Routing and switching
routing algorithms |
0.0 | 1 | 1976 | Effects of a Priority Discipline in Routing for Packet-Switched Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1976 |
Routing and switching › packet switching
store-and-forward network |
0.0 | 1 | 1976 | Effects of a Priority Discipline in Routing for Packet-Switched Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1976 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1976 | Effects of a Priority Discipline in Routing for Packet-Switched NetworksabstractThis paper addresses itself to some comparisons of adaptive routing algorithms in store-and-forward Communication nets. The intent here is to demonstrate how some relatively simple add-ons to already existing adaptive algorithms can decrease the average message delay and increase message throughput in the network. The overview of many existing routing algorithms is intended to point out that, although an algorithm may be adaptive, it is not necessarily good in terms of the performance measures addressed in this paper. The basic objective of this study is to assess the effects of endogenous priority assignment to messages that have reached some specified aging threshold while in the network and to note the effects of Such priority assignment on network performance. The performance measures are average message delay, throughput, and number of messages undelivered. The routing techniques are demonstrated via simulation on an 8node highly connected network and a 19-node Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA) network. The routing algorithms are applied with and without network element destruction on the selected networks. Raymond L. Pickholtz, Caldwell McCoy Jr. |
IEEE Trans. Commun. | 2 |