Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jordan Beichler

dblp:272/8281 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Authentication and access control · 44% Systems and software security · 44% Web and mobile security · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Authentication and access control
access control
0.412020
Kobold: Evaluating Decentralized Access Control for Remote NSXPC Methods on iOS · SP 2020
Systems and software security › operating system security
inter-process communication security
0.412020
Kobold: Evaluating Decentralized Access Control for Remote NSXPC Methods on iOS · SP 2020
Web and mobile security › mobile security
iOS security
0.112020
Kobold: Evaluating Decentralized Access Control for Remote NSXPC Methods on iOS · SP 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

static analysis · 0.4dynamic analysis · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Kobold: Evaluating Decentralized Access Control for Remote NSXPC Methods on iOS
abstract
Apple uses several access control mechanisms to prevent third party applications from directly accessing security sensitive resources, including sandboxing and file access control. However, third party applications may also indirectly access these resources using inter-process communication (IPC) with system daemons. If these daemons fail to properly enforce access control on IPC, confused deputy vulnerabilities may result. Identifying such vulnerabilities begins with an enumeration of all IPC services accessible to third party applications. However, the IPC interfaces and their corresponding access control policies are unknown and must be reverse engineered at a large scale. In this paper, we present the Kobold framework to study NSXPC-based system services using a combination of static and dynamic analysis. Using Kobold, we discovered multiple NSXPC services with confused deputy vulnerabilities and daemon crashes. Our findings include the ability to activate the microphone, disable access to all websites, and leak private data stored in iOS File Providers.
Luke Deshotels, Costin Carabas, Jordan Beichler, Razvan Deaconescu, William Enck
SP3