Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ferdinandy Chagas
dblp:272/8395
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software maintenance and evolution · 77% Empirical software engineering · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software maintenance and evolution
technical debt |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Managing Technical Debt Using Intelligent Techniques - A Systematic Mapping Study · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2023 |
Empirical software engineering › systematic literature review
systematic mapping study |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Managing Technical Debt Using Intelligent Techniques - A Systematic Mapping Study · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reasoning under uncertainty · 0.7machine learning · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Managing Technical Debt Using Intelligent Techniques - A Systematic Mapping StudyabstractTechnical Debt (TD) is a metaphor reflecting technical compromises that can yield short-term benefits but might hurt the long-term health of a software system. With the increasing amount of data generated when performing software development activities, an emergent research field has gained attention: applying Intelligent Techniques to solve Software Engineering problems. Intelligent Techniques were used to explore data for knowledge discovery, reasoning, learning, planning, perception, or supporting decision-making. Although these techniques can be promising, there is no structured understanding related to their application to support Technical Debt Management (TDM) activities. Within this context, this study aims to investigate to what extent the literature has proposed and evaluated solutions based on Intelligent Techniques to support TDM activities. To this end, we performed a Systematic Mapping Study (SMS) to investigate to what extent the literature has proposed and evaluated solutions based on Intelligent Techniques to support TDM activities. In total, 150 primary studies were identified and analyzed, dated from 2012 to 2021. The results indicated a growing interest in applying Intelligent Techniques to support TDM activities, the most used: Machine Learning and Reasoning under uncertainty. Intelligent Techniques aimed to assist mainly TDM activities related to identification, measurement, and monitoring. Design TD, Code TD, and Architectural TD are the TD types in the spotlight. Most studies were categorized at automation levels 1 and 2, meaning that existing approaches still require substantial human intervention. Symbolists and Analogizers are levels of explanation presented by most Intelligent Techniques, implying that these solutions conclude a general truth after considering a sufficient number of particular cases. Moreover, we also cataloged the empirical research types, contributions, and validation strategies described in primary studies. Based on our findings, we argue that there is still room to improve the use of Intelligent Techniques to support TDM activities. The open issues that emerged from this study can represent future opportunities for practitioners and researchers. Danyllo Albuquerque, Everton Guimarães, Graziela Tonin, Pilar Rodríguez 0002, Mirko Barbosa Perkusich, Hyggo Oliveira de Almeida, Angelo Perkusich, Ferdinandy Chagas |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 8 |