Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Peleg Harel

dblp:272/8765 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Geometric modeling and processing · 62% Image and video processing · 38%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing
jigsaw puzzle solving
1.322024
Pictorial and Apictorial Polygonal Jigsaw Puzzles from Arbitrary Number of Crossing Cuts · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2024
Crossing Cuts Polygonal Puzzles: Models and Solvers · CVPR 2021
Geometric modeling and processing › deformation modeling
mass-spring model
0.812024
Pictorial and Apictorial Polygonal Jigsaw Puzzles from Arbitrary Number of Crossing Cuts · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2024
Geometric modeling and processing › surface reconstruction
shape reconstruction
0.812024
Pictorial and Apictorial Polygonal Jigsaw Puzzles from Arbitrary Number of Crossing Cuts · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hierarchical loop constraints · 1.3layered reconstruction · 0.8spring-mass system · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Pictorial and Apictorial Polygonal Jigsaw Puzzles from Arbitrary Number of Crossing Cuts
abstract
Abstract Jigsaw puzzle solving, the problem of constructing a coherent whole from a set of non-overlapping unordered visual fragments, is fundamental to numerous applications, and yet most of the literature of the last two decades has focused thus far on less realistic puzzles whose pieces are identical squares. Here we formalize a new type of jigsaw puzzle where the pieces are general convex polygons generated by cutting through a global polygonal shape/image with an arbitrary number of straight cuts, a generation model inspired by the celebrated Lazy caterer’s sequence. We analyze the theoretical properties of such puzzles, including the inherent challenges in solving them once pieces are contaminated with geometrical noise. To cope with such difficulties and obtain tractable solutions, we abstract the problem as a multi-body spring-mass dynamical system endowed with hierarchical loop constraints and a layered reconstruction process. We define evaluation metrics and present experimental results on both apictorial and pictorial puzzles to show that they are solvable completely automatically.
Peleg Harel, Ofir Itzhak Shahar, Ohad Ben-Shahar
Int. J. Comput. Vis.1
2021 Crossing Cuts Polygonal Puzzles: Models and Solvers
abstract
Jigsaw puzzle solving, the problem of constructing a coherent whole from a set of non-overlapping un-ordered fragments, is fundamental to numerous applications, and yet most of the literature has focused thus far on less realistic puzzles whose pieces are identical squares. Here we formalize a new type of jigsaw puzzle where the pieces are general convex polygons generated by cutting through a global polygonal shape with an arbitrary number of straight cuts. We analyze the theoretical properties of such puzzles, including the inherent challenges in solving them once pieces are contaminated with geometrical noise. To cope with such difficulties and obtain tractable solutions, we abstract the problem as a multi-body spring-mass dynamical sys-tem endowed with hierarchical loop constraints and a layered reconstruction process that is guided by the pictorial content of the pieces. We define evaluation metrics and present experimental results on both apictorial and pictorial puzzles to indicate that they are solvable completely automatically.
Peleg Harel, Ohad Ben-Shahar
CVPR1