Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chenqing Hua

dblp:272/8791 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Graph learning · 62% Generative modeling · 22% Efficient and distributed learning · 8%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
1.832023
When Do Graph Neural Networks Help with Node Classification? Investigating the Homophily Principle on Node Distinguishability · NeurIPS 2023
Revisiting Heterophily For Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2022
High-Order Pooling for Graph Neural Networks with Tensor Decomposition · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
node classification
1.222023
When Do Graph Neural Networks Help with Node Classification? Investigating the Homophily Principle on Node Distinguishability · NeurIPS 2023
Revisiting Heterophily For Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling › flow matching
conditional flow matching
0.912025
RiboFlow: Conditional De Novo RNA Co-Design via Synergistic Flow Matching · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching
0.912025
RiboFlow: Conditional De Novo RNA Co-Design via Synergistic Flow Matching · NeurIPS 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics
RNA design
0.912025
RiboFlow: Conditional De Novo RNA Co-Design via Synergistic Flow Matching · NeurIPS 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction › enzyme function prediction
enzymatic reaction prediction
0.812024
ReactZyme: A Benchmark for Enzyme-Reaction Prediction · NeurIPS 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction
enzyme function prediction
0.812024
ReactZyme: A Benchmark for Enzyme-Reaction Prediction · NeurIPS 2024
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein function prediction
0.812024
ReactZyme: A Benchmark for Enzyme-Reaction Prediction · NeurIPS 2024
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.812024
ReactZyme: A Benchmark for Enzyme-Reaction Prediction · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning › neural architecture search
performance prediction
0.712023
When Do Graph Neural Networks Help with Node Classification? Investigating the Homophily Principle on Node Distinguishability · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
graph pooling
0.612022
High-Order Pooling for Graph Neural Networks with Tensor Decomposition · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › node classification
heterophilous node classification
0.612022
Revisiting Heterophily For Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
heterophily
0.612022
Revisiting Heterophily For Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
tensor decomposition
0.612022
High-Order Pooling for Graph Neural Networks with Tensor Decomposition · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

generative model · 1.7flow matching · 1.7retrieval ranking · 1.5machine learning · 1.5jeffreys divergence · 0.7contextual stochastic block model · 0.7bayes error · 0.7symmetric CP decomposition · 0.6multilinear map · 0.6local diversification · 0.6homophily metrics · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Graph Neural Networks Meet Probabilistic Graphical Models: A Survey
abstract
Graphs are a powerful data structure for representing relational data, and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as effective tools for inference and learning on graph-structured data. Probabilistic Graphical Models (PGMs), which provide compact graphical representations of variable distributions, offer a complementary approach with well-developed methods for capturing relationships and conducting message passing. In this survey, we explore how PGMs can enhance GNNs. We discuss how GNNs benefit from structured representations in PGMs, generate explainable predictions, and infer relationships. We also examine how GNNs are used within PGMs for more efficient inference and structure learning.
Chenqing Hua, Sitao Luan, Guy Wolf
ICASSP1
2025 RiboFlow: Conditional De Novo RNA Co-Design via Synergistic Flow Matching
abstract
Ribonucleic acid (RNA) binds to molecules to achieve specific biological functions. While generative models are advancing biomolecule design, existing methods for designing RNA that target specific ligands face limitations in capturing RNA’s conformational flexibility, ensuring structural validity, and overcoming data scarcity. To address these challenges, we introduce RiboFlow, a synergistic flow matching model to co-design RNA structures and sequences based on target molecules. By integrating RNA backbone frames, torsion angles, and sequence features in an unified architecture, RiboFlow explicitly models RNA’s dynamic conformations while enforcing sequence-structure consistency to improve validity. Additionally, we curate RiboBind, a large-scale dataset of RNA-molecule interactions, to resolve the scarcity of high-quality structural data. Extensive experiments reveal that RiboFlow not only outperforms state-of-the-art RNA design methods by a large margin but also showcases controllable capabilities for achieving high binding affinity to target ligands. Our work bridges critical gaps in controllable RNA design, offering a framework for structure-aware, data-efficient generation.
Chenqing Hua, Jiahua Rao, Zhuomin Zhou, Shuangjia Zheng
NeurIPS4
2024 ReactZyme: A Benchmark for Enzyme-Reaction Prediction
abstract
Enzymes, with their specific catalyzed reactions, are necessary for all aspects of life, enabling diverse biological processes and adaptations. Predicting enzyme functions is essential for understanding biological pathways, guiding drug development, enhancing bioproduct yields, and facilitating evolutionary studies.Addressing the inherent complexities, we introduce a new approach to annotating enzymes based on their catalyzed reactions. This method provides detailed insights into specific reactions and is adaptable to newly discovered reactions, diverging from traditional classifications by protein family or expert-derived reaction classes. We employ machine learning algorithms to analyze enzyme reaction datasets, delivering a much more refined view on the functionality of enzymes.Our evaluation leverages the largest enzyme-reaction dataset to date, derived from the SwissProt and Rhea databases with entries up to January 8, 2024. We frame the enzyme-reaction prediction as a retrieval problem, aiming to rank enzymes by their catalytic ability for specific reactions. With our model, we can recruit proteins for novel reactions and predict reactions in novel proteins, facilitating enzyme discovery and function annotation https://github.com/WillHua127/ReactZyme.
Chenqing Hua, Bozitao Zhong, Sitao Luan, Guy Wolf, Doina Precup, Shuangjia Zheng
NeurIPS1
2023 When Do Graph Neural Networks Help with Node Classification? Investigating the Homophily Principle on Node Distinguishability
abstract
Homophily principle, i.e., nodes with the same labels are more likely to be connected, has been believed to be the main reason for the performance superiority of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) over Neural Networks on node classification tasks. Recent research suggests that, even in the absence of homophily, the advantage of GNNs still exists as long as nodes from the same class share similar neighborhood patterns. However, this argument only considers intra-class Node Distinguishability (ND) but neglects inter-class ND, which provides incomplete understanding of homophily on GNNs. In this paper, we first demonstrate such deficiency with examples and argue that an ideal situation for ND is to have smaller intra-class ND than inter-class ND. To formulate this idea and study ND deeply, we propose Contextual Stochastic Block Model for Homophily (CSBM-H) and define two metrics, Probabilistic Bayes Error (PBE) and negative generalized Jeffreys divergence, to quantify ND. With the metrics, we visualize and analyze how graph filters, node degree distributions and class variances influence ND, and investigate the combined effect of intra- and inter-class ND. Besides, we discovered the mid-homophily pitfall, which occurs widely in graph datasets. Furthermore, we verified that, in real-work tasks, the superiority of GNNs is indeed closely related to both intra- and inter-class ND regardless of homophily levels. Grounded in this observation, we propose a new hypothesis-testing based performance metric beyond homophily, which is non-linear, feature-based and can provide statistical threshold value for GNNs' the superiority. Experiments indicate that it is significantly more effective than the existing homophily metrics on revealing the advantage and disadvantage of graph-aware modes on both synthetic and benchmark real-world datasets.
Sitao Luan, Chenqing Hua, Minkai Xu, Qincheng Lu, Xiao-Wen Chang, Jure Leskovec, Doina Precup
NeurIPS2
2022 High-Order Pooling for Graph Neural Networks with Tensor Decomposition
abstract
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are attracting growing attention due to their effectiveness and flexibility in modeling a variety of graph-structured data. Exiting GNN architectures usually adopt simple pooling operations~(\eg{} sum, average, max) when aggregating messages from a local neighborhood for updating node representation or pooling node representations from the entire graph to compute the graph representation. Though simple and effective, these linear operations do not model high-order non-linear interactions among nodes. We propose the Tensorized Graph Neural Network (tGNN), a highly expressive GNN architecture relying on tensor decomposition to model high-order non-linear node interactions. tGNN leverages the symmetric CP decomposition to efficiently parameterize permutation-invariant multilinear maps for modeling node interactions. Theoretical and empirical analysis on both node and graph classification tasks show the superiority of tGNN over competitive baselines. In particular, tGNN achieves the most solid results on two OGB node classification datasets and one OGB graph classification dataset.
Chenqing Hua, Guillaume Rabusseau
NeurIPS1
2022 Revisiting Heterophily For Graph Neural Networks
abstract
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) extend basic Neural Networks (NNs) by using graph structures based on the relational inductive bias (homophily assumption). While GNNs have been commonly believed to outperform NNs in real-world tasks, recent work has identified a non-trivial set of datasets where their performance compared to NNs is not satisfactory. Heterophily has been considered the main cause of this empirical observation and numerous works have been put forward to address it. In this paper, we first revisit the widely used homophily metrics and point out that their consideration of only graph-label consistency is a shortcoming. Then, we study heterophily from the perspective of post-aggregation node similarity and define new homophily metrics, which are potentially advantageous compared to existing ones. Based on this investigation, we prove that some harmful cases of heterophily can be effectively addressed by local diversification operation. Then, we propose the Adaptive Channel Mixing (ACM), a framework to adaptively exploit aggregation, diversification and identity channels to extract richer localized information in each baseline GNN layer. ACM is more powerful than the commonly used uni-channel framework for node classification tasks on heterophilic graphs. When evaluated on 10 benchmark node classification tasks, ACM-augmented baselines consistently achieve significant performance gain, exceeding state-of-the-art GNNs on most tasks without incurring significant computational burden. (Code: https://github.com/SitaoLuan/ACM-GNN)
Sitao Luan, Chenqing Hua, Qincheng Lu, Mingde Zhao 0001, Xiao-Wen Chang, Doina Precup
NeurIPS2