Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Susang Lee

dblp:273/0230 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-6882-9558ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Computational social science and digital humanities · 64% Environmental and earth informatics · 36%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Environmental and earth informatics › geoinformatics
geospatial data analysis
0.612022
Learning Economic Indicators by Aggregating Multi-Level Geospatial Information · AAAI 2022
Computer vision › 3D vision › remote sensing › remote sensing image analysis
satellite imagery analysis
0.212022
Learning Economic Indicators by Aggregating Multi-Level Geospatial Information · AAAI 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ordinal regression · 1.1deep learning · 1.1unsupervised learning · 0.4human-in-the-loop · 0.4clustering · 0.4CNN · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Learning Economic Indicators by Aggregating Multi-Level Geospatial Information
abstract
High-resolution daytime satellite imagery has become a promising source to study economic activities. These images display detailed terrain over large areas and allow zooming into smaller neighborhoods. Existing methods, however, have utilized images only in a single-level geographical unit. This research presents a deep learning model to predict economic indicators via aggregating traits observed from multiple levels of geographical units. The model first measures hyperlocal economy over small communities via ordinal regression. The next step extracts district-level features by summarizing interconnection among hyperlocal economies. In the final step, the model estimates economic indicators of districts via aggregating the hyperlocal and district information. Our new multi-level learning model substantially outperforms strong baselines in predicting key indicators such as population, purchasing power, and energy consumption. The model is also robust against data shortage; the trained features from one country can generalize to other countries when evaluated with data gathered from Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam. We discuss the multi-level model's implications for measuring inequality, which is the essential first step in policy and social science research on inequality and poverty.
Sungwon Park 0001, Sungwon Han 0001, Donghyun Ahn, Jaeyeon Kim, Jeasurk Yang, Susang Lee, Seunghoon Hong, Hyunjoo Yang, Meeyoung Cha
AAAI6
2020 Learning to Score Economic Development from Satellite Imagery
abstract
Reliable and timely measurements of economic activities are fundamental for understanding economic development and designing government policies. However, many developing countries still lack reliable data. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach for measuring economic development from high-resolution satellite images in the absence of ground truth statistics. Our method consists of three steps. First, we run a clustering algorithm on satellite images that distinguishes artifacts from nature (siCluster). Second, we generate a partial order graph of the identified clusters based on the level of economic development, either by human guidance or by low-resolution statistics (siPog). Third, we use a CNN-based sorter that assigns differentiable scores to each satellite grid based on the relative ranks of clusters (siScore). The novelty of our method is that we break down a computationally hard problem into sub-tasks, which involves a human-in-the-loop solution. With the combination of unsupervised learning and the partial orders of dozens of urban vs. rural clusters, our method can estimate the economic development scores of over 10,000 satellite grids consistently with other baseline development proxies (Spearman correlation of 0.851). This efficient method is interpretable and robust; we demonstrate how to apply our method to both developed (e.g., South Korea) and developing economies (e.g., Vietnam and Malawi).
Sungwon Han 0001, Donghyun Ahn, Sungwon Park 0001, Jeasurk Yang, Susang Lee, Hyunjoo Yang, Meeyoung Cha
KDD5