Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matthew Cleaveland
dblp:273/0384
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-3671-5297ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 78% Motion planning and robot control · 22% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
conformal prediction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Conformal Prediction Regions for Time Series Using Linear Complementarity Programming · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Conformal Prediction Regions for Time Series Using Linear Complementarity Programming · AAAI 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › constrained optimization › complementarity problems
linear complementarity problem |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Conformal Prediction Regions for Time Series Using Linear Complementarity Programming · AAAI 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
mixed integer linear programming |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Conformal Prediction Regions for Time Series Using Linear Complementarity Programming · AAAI 2024 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
neural network controller |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Risk verification of stochastic systems with neural network controllers · Artif. Intell. 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Risk verification of stochastic systems with neural network controllers · Artif. Intell. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mixed integer linear complementarity programming · 1.5conformal prediction · 1.5stochastic systems · 0.6neural network verification · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Distributionally Robust Statistical Verification with Imprecise Neural NetworksabstractA particularly challenging problem in AI safety is providing guarantees on the behavior of high-dimensional autonomous systems. Verification approaches centered around reachability analysis fail to scale, and purely statistical approaches are constrained by the distributional assumptions about the sampling process. Instead, we pose a distributionally robust version of the statistical verification problem for black-box systems, where our performance guarantees hold over a large family of distributions. This paper proposes a novel approach based on uncertainty quantification using concepts from imprecise probabilities. A central piece of our approach is an ensemble technique called Imprecise Neural Networks, which provides the uncertainty quantification. Additionally, we solve the allied problem of exploring the input set using active learning. The active learning uses an exhaustive neural-network verification tool Sherlock to collect samples. An evaluation on multiple physical simulators in the openAI gym Mujoco environments with reinforcement-learned controllers demonstrates that our approach can provide useful and scalable guarantees for high-dimensional systems. Souradeep Dutta, Michele Caprio, Vivian Lin, Matthew Cleaveland, Kuk Jin Jang, Ivan Ruchkin, Oleg Sokolsky, Insup Lee 0001 |
HSCC | 4 |
| 2024 | Conformal Prediction Regions for Time Series Using Linear Complementarity ProgrammingabstractConformal prediction is a statistical tool for producing prediction regions of machine learning models that are valid with high probability. However, applying conformal prediction to time series data leads to conservative prediction regions. In fact, to obtain prediction regions over T time steps with confidence 1--delta, previous works require that each individual prediction region is valid with confidence 1--delta/T. We propose an optimization-based method for reducing this conservatism to enable long horizon planning and verification when using learning-enabled time series predictors. Instead of considering prediction errors individually at each time step, we consider a parameterized prediction error over multiple time steps. By optimizing the parameters over an additional dataset, we find prediction regions that are not conservative. We show that this problem can be cast as a mixed integer linear complementarity program (MILCP), which we then relax into a linear complementarity program (LCP). Additionally, we prove that the relaxed LP has the same optimal cost as the original MILCP. Finally, we demonstrate the efficacy of our method on case studies using pedestrian trajectory predictors and F16 fighter jet altitude predictors. Matthew Cleaveland, Insup Lee 0001, George J. Pappas, Lars Lindemann |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2022 | Learning Enabled Fast Planning and Control in Dynamic Environments with Intermittent InformationabstractThis paper addresses a safe planning and control problem for mobile robots operating in communication- and sensor-limited dynamic environments. In this case the robots cannot sense the objects around them and must instead rely on intermittent, external information about the environment, as e.g., in underwater applications. The challenge in this case is that the robots must plan using only this stale data, while accounting for any noise in the data or uncertainty in the environment. To address this challenge we propose a compositional technique which leverages neural networks to quickly plan and control a robot through crowded and dynamic environments using only intermittent information. Specifically, our tool uses reachability analysis and potential fields to train a neural network that is capable of generating safe control actions. We demonstrate our technique both in simulation with an underwater vehicle crossing a crowded shipping channel and with real experiments with ground vehicles in communication-and sensor-limited environments. Matthew Cleaveland, Esen Yel, Yiannis Kantaros, Insup Lee 0001, Nicola Bezzo |
IROS | 1 |
| 2022 | Risk verification of stochastic systems with neural network controllers
Matthew Cleaveland, Lars Lindemann, Radoslav Ivanov, George J. Pappas |
Artif. Intell. | 1 |