EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jiazheng Ding
dblp:273/3231
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0009-2884-7434ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 50% Deep learning architectures and training · 25% Video understanding and tracking · 25% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 50% Program verification · 50% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Reasoning is Periodicity? Improving Large Language Models Through Effective Periodicity Modeling · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
language model pretraining |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Reasoning is Periodicity? Improving Large Language Models Through Effective Periodicity Modeling · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Reasoning is Periodicity? Improving Large Language Models Through Effective Periodicity Modeling · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › motion detection
periodic motion detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Reasoning is Periodicity? Improving Large Language Models Through Effective Periodicity Modeling · NeurIPS 2025 |
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CodeScore: Evaluating Code Generation by Learning Code Execution · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2025 |
Program verification
functional correctness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | CodeScore: Evaluating Code Generation by Learning Code Execution · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
unified learning framework · 0.9large language model · 0.9fourier analysis network · 0.9attention mechanism · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Reasoning is Periodicity? Improving Large Language Models Through Effective Periodicity ModelingabstractPeriodicity, as one of the most important basic characteristics, lays the foundation for facilitating structured knowledge acquisition and systematic cognitive processes within human learning paradigms. However, the potential flaws of periodicity modeling in Transformer affect the learning efficiency and establishment of underlying principles from data for large language models (LLMs) built upon it. In this paper, we demonstrate that integrating effective periodicity modeling can improve the learning efficiency and performance of LLMs. We introduce FANformer, which adapts Fourier Analysis Network (FAN) into attention mechanism to achieve efficient periodicity modeling, by modifying the feature projection process of attention mechanism. Extensive experimental results on language modeling show that FANformer consistently outperforms Transformer when scaling up model size and training tokens, underscoring its superior learning efficiency. Our pretrained FANformer-1B exhibits marked improvements on downstream tasks compared to open-source LLMs with similar model parameters or training tokens. Moreover, we reveal that FANformer exhibits superior ability to learn and apply rules for reasoning compared to Transformer. The results position FANformer as an effective and promising architecture for advancing LLMs. Yihong Dong, Ge Li 0001, Yongding Tao, Kechi Zhang, Lecheng Wang, Huanyu Liu 0001, Jiazheng Ding, Jia Li 0011, Jinliang Deng, Hong Mei 0001 |
NeurIPS | 9 |
| 2025 | CodeScore: Evaluating Code Generation by Learning Code ExecutionabstractA proper code evaluation metric (CEM) profoundly impacts the evolution of code generation, which is an important research field in NLP and software engineering. Prevailing match-based CEMs (e.g., BLEU, Accuracy, and CodeBLEU) suffer from two significant drawbacks. 1. They primarily measure the surface differences between codes without considering their functional equivalence. However, functional equivalence is pivotal in evaluating the effectiveness of code generation, as different codes can perform identical operations. 2. They are predominantly designed for the Ref-only input format. However, code evaluation necessitates versatility in input formats. Aside from Ref-only, there are NL-only and Ref and NL formats, which existing match-based CEMs cannot effectively accommodate. In this article, we propose CodeScore, a large language model (LLM)-based CEM, which estimates the functional correctness of generated code on three input types. To acquire CodeScore, we present UniCE, a unified code generation learning framework, for LLMs to learn code execution (i.e., learning PassRatio and Executability of generated code) with unified input. Extensive experimental results on multiple code evaluation datasets demonstrate that CodeScore absolutely improves up to 58.87% correlation with functional correctness compared to other CEMs, achieves state-of-the-art performance, and effectively handles three input formats. Yihong Dong, Jiazheng Ding, Ge Li 0001, Zhuo Li 0013, Zhi Jin 0001 |
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. | 2 |