Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lukasz Jocz

dblp:273/3978 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 70% Image recognition and object detection · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene understanding
0.512021
Holistic Multi-View Building Analysis in the Wild with Projection Pooling · AAAI 2021
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
fine-grained image classification
0.512021
Holistic Multi-View Building Analysis in the Wild with Projection Pooling · AAAI 2021
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d scene understanding
urban scene analysis
0.512021
Holistic Multi-View Building Analysis in the Wild with Projection Pooling · AAAI 2021
Computer vision › 3D vision › remote sensing
remote sensing image analysis
0.112021
Holistic Multi-View Building Analysis in the Wild with Projection Pooling · AAAI 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

projection pooling · 0.5convolutional neural network · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Holistic Multi-View Building Analysis in the Wild with Projection Pooling
abstract
We address six different classification tasks related to fine-grained building attributes: construction type, number of floors, pitch and geometry of the roof, facade material, and occupancy class. Tackling such a remote building analysis problem became possible only recently due to growing large-scale datasets of urban scenes. To this end, we introduce a new benchmarking dataset, consisting of 49426 images (top-view and street-view) of 9674 buildings. These photos are further assembled, together with the geometric metadata. The dataset showcases various real-world challenges, such as occlusions, blur, partially visible objects, and a broad spectrum of buildings. We propose a new \emph{projection pooling layer}, creating a unified, top-view representation of the top-view and the side views in a high-dimensional space. It allows us to utilize the building and imagery metadata seamlessly. Introducing this layer improves classification accuracy -- compared to highly tuned baseline models -- indicating its suitability for building analysis.
Zbigniew Wojna, Krzysztof Maziarz, Lukasz Jocz, Robert Paluba, Robert Kozikowski, Iasonas Kokkinos
AAAI3