Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kavya Manohar

dblp:273/5509 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-2402-5272ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Speech recognition and synthesis · 50% Information extraction and text analysis · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
automatic speech recognition
0.812024
What is lost in Normalization? Exploring Pitfalls in Multilingual ASR Model Evaluations · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text normalization
0.812024
What is lost in Normalization? Exploring Pitfalls in Multilingual ASR Model Evaluations · EMNLP 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

text similarity scoring · 0.8linguistic analysis · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Scalable Offline ASR for Command-Style Dictation in Courtrooms
Kumarmanas Nethil, Kriti Anandan, Kavya Manohar
INTERSPEECH4
2024 What is lost in Normalization? Exploring Pitfalls in Multilingual ASR Model Evaluations
abstract
This paper explores the pitfalls in evaluating multilingual automatic speech recognition (ASR) models, with a particular focus on Indic language scripts.We investigate the text normalization routine employed by leading ASR models, including OpenAI Whisper, Meta's MMS, Seamless, and Assembly AI's Conformer, and their unintended consequences on performance metrics.Our research reveals that current text normalization practices, while aiming to standardize ASR outputs for fair comparison, by removing inconsistencies such as variations in spelling, punctuation, and special characters, are fundamentally flawed when applied to Indic scripts.Through empirical analysis using text similarity scores and in-depth linguistic examination, we demonstrate that these flaws lead to artificially improved performance metrics for Indic languages.We conclude by proposing a shift towards developing text normalization routines that leverage native linguistic expertise, ensuring more robust and accurate evaluations of multilingual ASR models.
Kavya Manohar, Leena G. Pillai
EMNLP1