EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ayesha Qamar
dblp:273/6982
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 77% Language models and text generation · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › dialogue understanding
dialogue act classification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Do LLMs Understand Dialogues? A Case Study on Dialogue Acts · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Do LLMs Understand Dialogues? A Case Study on Dialogue Acts · ACL (1) 2025 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Do LLMs Understand Dialogues? A Case Study on Dialogue ActsabstractRecent advancements in NLP, largely driven by Large Language Models (LLMs), have significantly improved performance on an array of tasks.However, Dialogue Act (DA) classification remains challenging, particularly in the fine-grained 50-class, multiparty setting.This paper investigates the root causes of LLMs' poor performance in DA classification through a linguistically motivated analysis.We identify three key pre-tasks essential for accurate DA prediction: Turn Management, Communicative Function Identification, and Dialogue Structure Prediction.Our experiments reveal that LLMs struggle with these fundamental tasks, often failing to outperform simple rulebased baselines.Additionally, we establish a strong empirical correlation between errors in these pre-tasks and DA classification failures.A human study further highlights the significant gap between LLM and human-level dialogue understanding.These findings indicate that LLMs' shortcomings in dialogue comprehension hinder their ability to accurately predict DAs, highlighting the need for improved dialogue-aware training approaches. InstructionYou are an intelligent annotator capable of classifying the intention behind each speaker's utterance.You will be provided with a list of possible Dialogue Acts and their definitions.You will be given an utterance surrounded by '#'.Your task is to predict the correct label for that utterance.You will also be given a snapshot of the conversation to provide context for your prediction.Return the answer in the format: 'label:predicted label'.The Dialogue Acts and their definitions are as follows: Statement: General statements.Accept: A short utterance indicating acceptance of a previous speaker's statement.Disruption: Indecipherable or disrupted speech.Defending/Explanation: The speaker defends their opinion or provides an explanation. Ayesha Qamar, Jonathan Tong, Ruihong Huang |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2024 | EMONA: Event-level Moral Opinions in News ArticlesabstractYuanyuan Lei, Md Messal Monem Miah, Ayesha Qamar, Sai Ramana Reddy, Jonathan Tong, Haotian Xu, Ruihong Huang. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024. Yuanyuan Lei 0001, Md Messal Monem Miah, Ayesha Qamar, Sai Ramana Reddy, Jonathan Tong, Haotian Xu 0004, Ruihong Huang |
NAACL-HLT | 3 |
| 2021 | Orchestration- and choreography-based composition of Internet of Transactional Things
Zakaria Maamar, Muhammad Asim 0001, Saoussen Cheikhrouhou, Ayesha Qamar |
Serv. Oriented Comput. Appl. | 4 |