Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aoru Xue
dblp:273/7486
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Face, body and person analysis · 44% 3D vision · 44% Robot navigation and mapping · 13% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Wearable and physiological sensing · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
human pose estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FreeCap: Hybrid Calibration-Free Motion Capture in Open Environments · AAAI 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion capture
multi-person motion capture |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FreeCap: Hybrid Calibration-Free Motion Capture in Open Environments · AAAI 2025 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
sensor calibration |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | FreeCap: Hybrid Calibration-Free Motion Capture in Open Environments · AAAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pose optimization · 1.7LiDAR · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | FreeCap: Hybrid Calibration-Free Motion Capture in Open EnvironmentsabstractWe propose a novel hybrid calibration-free method FreeCap to accurately capture global multi-person motions in open environments. Our system combines a single LiDAR with expandable moving cameras, allowing for flexible and precise motion estimation in a unified world coordinate. In particular, We introduce a local-to-global pose-aware cross-sensor human-matching module that predicts the alignment among each sensor, even in the absence of calibration. Additionally, our coarse-to-fine sensor-expandable pose optimizer further optimizes the 3D human key points and the alignments, it is also capable of incorporating additional cameras to enhance accuracy. Extensive experiments on Human-M3 and FreeMotion datasets demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms state-of-the-art single-modal methods, offering an expandable and efficient solution for multi-person motion capture across various applications. Aoru Xue, Yiming Ren 0001, Zining Song, Mao Ye 0005, Xinge Zhu, Yuexin Ma |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2020 | Robust landmark-free head pose estimation by learning to crop and background augmentationabstractIt is well known that the performance of head pose estimation is greatly affected by the bounding box margin of the face and its background. Traditionally, researchers will manually choose a suitable bounding box margin to strike a balance between ensuring sufficient information and minimising background noise. However, head pose estimation is still worse when the background is complex in reality or when the box margin changes slightly. To make estimation results more robust, the authors propose two methods to improve it: (i) a convolutional cropping module that can learn to crop the input image to an attentional area for head pose regression. (ii) Background augmentation that can make the network more robust to the background noise. Rather than using the face landmarking to calculate head pose angles, they use another convolutional neural network to regress the head pose angles, which is independent of the landmark detection results. They evaluate the method on BIWI and AFLW2000 dataset and experimental results show that their approach outperforms many other methods. Besides, they evaluate the method on Pointing′04 dataset using head pose accuracy. Furthermore, the approach is more robust and has a lower variance in realistic scenarios. Aoru Xue, Songmin Dai, Xiaoqiang Li 0002 |
IET Image Process. | 1 |