Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Didrik Lundberg

dblp:273/9547 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-9921-3257ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Software-defined and programmable networks · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Logic in computer science · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software-defined and programmable networks
programmable data plane
0.812024
HOL4P4: Mechanized Small-Step Semantics for P4 · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2024
Logic in computer science › program semantics
operational semantics
0.812024
HOL4P4: Mechanized Small-Step Semantics for P4 · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2024
Programming languages and type systems › type systems › type soundness
progress and preservation
0.212024
HOL4P4: Mechanized Small-Step Semantics for P4 · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2024
Programming languages and type systems › type systems
type soundness
0.212024
HOL4P4: Mechanized Small-Step Semantics for P4 · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

type system · 2.3mechanized semantics · 2.3HOL4 theorem prover · 2.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Hoare-style logic for unstructured programs
abstract
Enabling Hoare-style reasoning for low-level code is attractive since it opens the way to regain structure and modularity in a domain where structure is essentially absent. The field, however, has not yet arrived at a fully satisfactory solution, in the sense of avoiding restrictions on control flow (important for compiler optimization), controlling access to intermediate program points (important for modularity), and supporting total correctness. Proposals in the literature support some of these properties, but a solution that meets them all is yet to be found. We introduce the novel Hoare-style program logic L A , which interprets postconditions relative to program points when these are first encountered. The logic supports both partial and total correctness, derives contracts for arbitrary control flow, and allows one to freely choose decomposition strategy during verification while avoiding step-indexed approximations and global invariants. The logic can be instantiated for a variety of concrete instruction set architectures and intermediate languages. The rules of L A have been verified in the interactive theorem prover HOL4 and integrated with the toolbox HolBA for semi-automated program verification, which supports the ARMv6, ARMv8 and RISC-V instruction sets.
Didrik Lundberg, Roberto Guanciale, Andreas Lindner, Mads Dam
J. Log. Algebraic Methods Program.1
2024 HOL4P4: Mechanized Small-Step Semantics for P4
abstract
We present the first semantics of the network data plane programming language P4 able to adequately capture all key features of P4 16 , the most recent version of P4, including external functions (externs) and concurrency. These features are intimately related since, in P4, extern invocations are the only points at which one execution thread can affect another. Reflecting P4’s lack of a general-purpose memory and the presence of multithreading the semantics is given in small-step style and eschews the use of a heap. In addition to the P4 language itself, we provide an architectural level semantics, which allows the composition of P4-programmed blocks, models end-to-end packet processing, and can take into account features such as arbitration and packet recirculation. A corresponding type system is provided with attendant progress, preservation, and type-soundness theorems. Semantics, type system, and meta-theory are formalized in the HOL4 theorem prover. From this formalization, we derive a HOL4 executable semantics that supports verified execution of programs with partially symbolic packets able to validate simple end-to-end program properties.
Anoud Alshnakat, Didrik Lundberg, Roberto Guanciale, Mads Dam
Proc. ACM Program. Lang.2
2020 Hoare-Style Logic for Unstructured Programs
Didrik Lundberg, Roberto Guanciale, Andreas Lindner, Mads Dam
SEFM1