Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Qunzhi Xu
dblp:273/9948
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-2524-2260ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 4 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 43% Generative modeling · 14% Trustworthy machine learning · 14% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Information theory · 38% Algorithms and data structures · 33% Mathematical optimization · 17% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › confidence set construction
confidence intervals |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Beyond Point Prediction: Score Matching-based Pseudolikelihood Estimation of Neural Marked Spatio-Temporal Point Process · ICML 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › event analysis
event prediction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Beyond Point Prediction: Score Matching-based Pseudolikelihood Estimation of Neural Marked Spatio-Temporal Point Process · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
point process |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Beyond Point Prediction: Score Matching-based Pseudolikelihood Estimation of Neural Marked Spatio-Temporal Point Process · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
pseudolikelihood estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Beyond Point Prediction: Score Matching-based Pseudolikelihood Estimation of Neural Marked Spatio-Temporal Point Process · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
score matching |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Beyond Point Prediction: Score Matching-based Pseudolikelihood Estimation of Neural Marked Spatio-Temporal Point Process · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › point process
spatio-temporal point process |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Beyond Point Prediction: Score Matching-based Pseudolikelihood Estimation of Neural Marked Spatio-Temporal Point Process · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Beyond Point Prediction: Score Matching-based Pseudolikelihood Estimation of Neural Marked Spatio-Temporal Point Process · ICML 2024 |
Algorithms and data structures
classification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Pivotal Estimation of Linear Discriminant Analysis in High Dimensions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
high-dimensional statistics |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Pivotal Estimation of Linear Discriminant Analysis in High Dimensions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › dimensionality reduction
linear discriminant analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Pivotal Estimation of Linear Discriminant Analysis in High Dimensions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Information theory › asymptotic analysis
asymptotic optimality |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Optimum Multi-Stream Sequential Change-Point Detection With Sampling Control · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021 |
Information theory › statistical inference › sequential analysis › sequential detection
quickest change detection |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Optimum Multi-Stream Sequential Change-Point Detection With Sampling Control · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021 |
Coding theory › channel coding › error exponent
second-order asymptotics |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Optimum Multi-Stream Sequential Change-Point Detection With Sampling Control · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
score-based sampling · 0.8score matching · 0.8penalized estimation · 0.7convergence rate analysis · 0.7sequential detection theory · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Beyond Point Prediction: Score Matching-based Pseudolikelihood Estimation of Neural Marked Spatio-Temporal Point ProcessabstractSpatio-temporal point processes (STPPs) are potent mathematical tools for modeling and predicting events with both temporal and spatial features. Despite their versatility, most existing methods for learning STPPs either assume a restricted form of the spatio-temporal distribution, or suffer from inaccurate approximations of the intractable integral in the likelihood training objective. These issues typically arise from the normalization term of the probability density function. Moreover, existing works only provide point prediction for events without quantifying their uncertainty, such as confidence intervals for the event’s arrival time and confidence regions for the event’s location, which is crucial given the considerable randomness of the data. To tackle these challenges, we introduce SMASH: a Score MAtching-based pSeudolikeliHood estimator for learning marked STPPs. Specifically, our framework adopts a normalization-free objective by estimating the pseudolikelihood of marked STPPs through score-matching and predicts confidence intervals/regions for event time and location by generating samples through a score-based sampling algorithm. The superior performance of our proposed framework is demonstrated through extensive experiments on both point and confidence interval/region prediction of events. Zichong Li, Qunzhi Xu, Zhenghao Xu, Yajun Mei, Tuo Zhao, Hongyuan Zha |
ICML | 2 |
| 2024 | Quickest Detection in High-Dimensional Linear Regression Models via Implicit RegularizationabstractIn this paper, we consider the quickest detection problem in high-dimensional streaming data, where the unknown regression coefficients might change at some unknown time. We propose a quickest detection algorithm based on the implicit regularization algorithm via gradient descent, and provide theoretical guarantees on the average run length to false alarm and detection delay. Numerical studies are conducted to validate the theoretical results. Qunzhi Xu, Yi Yu 0016, Yajun Mei |
ISIT | 1 |
| 2023 | Pivotal Estimation of Linear Discriminant Analysis in High DimensionsabstractWe consider the linear discriminant analysis problem in the high-dimensional settings. In this work, we propose PANDA(PivotAl liNear Discriminant Analysis), a tuning insensitive method in the sense that it requires very little effort to tune the parameters. Moreover, we prove that PANDA achieves the optimal convergence rate in terms of both the estimation error and misclassification rate. Our theoretical results are backed up by thorough numerical studies using both simulated and real datasets. In comparison with the existing methods, we observe that our proposed PANDA yields equal or better performance, and requires substantially less effort in parameter tuning. Ethan X. Fang, Yajun Mei, Qunzhi Xu, Tuo Zhao |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 4 |
| 2022 | Active Quickest Detection When Monitoring Multi-streams with Two Affected StreamsabstractWe study the multi-stream quickest detection problem under the active learning setup, It is assumed that there are p local streams in a system and s ≤ p unknown local streams are affected by an undesired event at some unknown time, but one is only able to take observations from r of these p local streams at each time instant. The objective is how to adaptively sample from these p local streams and how to use the observed data to raise a correct global alarm as quickly as possible. In this paper, we develop the first asymptotic optimality theory in the active quickest detection literature for the case when s = r = 2. To be more concrete, we propose to combine three ideas to develop efficient active quickest detection algorithms: (1) win-stay, lose-switch sampling strategy; (2) local CUSUM statistics for local monitoring; and (3) the SUM-Shrinkage technique to fuse local statistics into a global decision. We show that our proposed algorithms are asymptotically optimal in the sense of minimizing detection delay up to the second order subject to the false alarm constraint. Numerical studies are conducted to validate our theoretical results. Qunzhi Xu, Yajun Mei |
ISIT | 1 |
| 2021 | Multi-Stream Quickest Detection with Unknown Post-Change Parameters Under Sampling ControlabstractThe multi-stream quickest detection problem with unknown post-change parameters is studied under the sampling control constraint, where there are$M$local processes in a system but one is only able to take observations from one of these$M$local processes at each time instant. The objective is to raise a correct alarm as quickly as possible once the change occurs subject to both false alarm and sampling control constraints. We propose an efficient myopic-sampling-based quickest detection algorithm under sampling control constraint, and show it is asymptotically optimal in the sense of minimizing the detection delay under our context when the number$M$of processes is fixed. Simulation studies are conducted to validate our theoretical results. Qunzhi Xu, Yajun Mei |
ISIT | 1 |
| 2021 | Optimum Multi-Stream Sequential Change-Point Detection With Sampling ControlabstractIn multi-stream sequential change-point detection it is assumed that there are$M$processes in a system and at some unknown time, an occurring event changes the distribution of the samples of a particular process. In this article, we consider this problem under a sampling control constraint when one is allowed, at each point in time, to sample a single process. The objective is to raise an alarm as quickly as possible subject to a proper false alarm constraint. We show that under sampling control, a simple myopic-sampling-based sequential change-point detection strategy is second-order asymptotically optimal when the number$M$of processes is fixed. This means that the proposed detector, even by sampling with a rate$1/M$of the full rate, enjoys the same detection delay, up to some additive finite constant, as the optimal procedure. Simulation experiments corroborate our theoretical results. Qunzhi Xu, Yajun Mei, George V. Moustakides |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2020 | Second-Order Asymptotically Optimal Change-point Detection Algorithm with Sampling ControlabstractIn the sequential change-point detection problem for multi-stream data, it is assumed that there are M processes in a system and at some unknown time, an occurring event impacts one unknown local process in the sense of changing the distribution of observations from that affected local process. In this paper, we consider such problem under the sampling control constraint, in which one is able to take observations from only one of the local processes at each time step. Our objective is to design an adaptive sampling policy and a stopping time policy that is able to raise a correct alarm as quickly as possible subject to the false alarm and sampling control constraint. We develop an efficient sequential change-point detection algorithm under the sampling control that turns out to be second-order asymptotically optimal under the full data scenario. That is, with the sampling rate that is only 1/M of the full data scenario, our proposed algorithm has the same performance up to second-order as the optimal procedure under the full data scenario. Qunzhi Xu, Yajun Mei, George V. Moustakides |
ISIT | 1 |