Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Liqi Ping

dblp:274/0566 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-0897-9252ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 54% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 46%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › soft errors
architectural vulnerability factor
0.712023
Saca-AVF: A Quantitative Approach to Analyze the Architectural Vulnerability Factors of CNN Accelerators · IEEE Trans. Computers 2023
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator
CNN accelerator
0.712023
Saca-AVF: A Quantitative Approach to Analyze the Architectural Vulnerability Factors of CNN Accelerators · IEEE Trans. Computers 2023
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
soft errors
0.712023
Saca-AVF: A Quantitative Approach to Analyze the Architectural Vulnerability Factors of CNN Accelerators · IEEE Trans. Computers 2023
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
systolic array
0.712023
Saca-AVF: A Quantitative Approach to Analyze the Architectural Vulnerability Factors of CNN Accelerators · IEEE Trans. Computers 2023
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
fault injection
0.212023
Saca-AVF: A Quantitative Approach to Analyze the Architectural Vulnerability Factors of CNN Accelerators · IEEE Trans. Computers 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fault injection · 0.7ACE analysis · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Saca-AVF: A Quantitative Approach to Analyze the Architectural Vulnerability Factors of CNN Accelerators
abstract
Convolutional neural network (CNN) accelerators are widely used in artificial intelligence applications, such as image recognitions, due to their superior computing performance. However, as manufacturing technology scales down, the shrinking of chip size and the increasing of integration density make CNN accelerators vulnerable to soft errors, which are key factors affecting the reliability of integrated circuits. For emerging CNN applications where reliability is critical (such as self-driving cars), visible faults in applications’ outputs caused by soft errors may lead to catastrophic consequences. Therefore, it is important to consider reliability into CNN accelerators’ architecture design. Recent modeling and fault injection approaches analyze the reliability features of CNN models, but none evaluate the soft error reliability of CNN accelerators from architecture level. The Architectural Vulnerability Factor (AVF) indicates the probability that a soft error results in faulty computation outcomes. The Architecturally Correct Execution (ACE) method analyzes AVF of structures by identifying ACE bits and calculating their residency time. Based on the traditional ACE-based AVF analysis model, we propose a quantitative approach saca-AVF to analyze the AVF of systolic array based CNN accelerators that perform homogeneous matrix arithmetic operations instead of various kinds of instructions. We explore the reliability features of CNN accelerators under different design choices at different levels leveraging saca-AVF. We also observe several reliability characteristics of CNN accelerator architecture. We believe our proposed saca-AVF and the observations we made are able to guide designers to discover the reliability hotspots of CNN accelerators and build highly reliable CNN accelerators.
Jingweijia Tan, Liqi Ping, Qixiang Wang, Kaige Yan
IEEE Trans. Computers2
2020 SERN: Modeling and Analyzing the Soft Error Reliability of Convolutional Neural Networks
abstract
Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are popular in artificial intelligence areas due to their high accuracy. Meanwhile, as manufacturing process technology scales, the probability of soft errors occurrence in computer systems increases, which causes reliability challenges for CNNs. For emerging safety and reliability critical CNN applications, such as autonomous vehicles, soft errors may cause catastrophic consequences. Thus it is important to analyze the vulnerability characteristics of CNNs. A common approach to analyze CNNs' reliability is fault injection, which requires a lot of computation resources and is time consuming. Thus a more efficient method is desired. In this work, we propose an analytical model named SERN to analyze the soft error reliability of CNNs, which requires only a small number of parameters in CNN models. Validation on several common CNN models shows SERN can efficiently and accurately perform soft error reliability analysis for CNNs. We also observe that the reliability of CNNs depend on data types, values, the sign of data and types of layers. Take advantage of these observations, we propose to protect vulnerable bits through ECC and protect error-prone layers through redundancy.
Liqi Ping, Jingweijia Tan, Kaige Yan
ACM Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI1