Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Emine Küçükbenli
dblp:274/0939
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-0588-7750ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Generative modeling · 67% Graph learning · 17% Efficient and distributed learning · 17% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 56% Computational science and engineering · 44% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 50% GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 50% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › geometric graph neural network
equivariant graph neural network |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tensor Decomposition Networks for Fast Machine Learning Interatomic Potential Computations · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Efficient Molecular Conformer Generation with SO(3)-Averaged Flow Matching and Reflow · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tensor Decomposition Networks for Fast Machine Learning Interatomic Potential Computations · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
molecular conformation generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Efficient Molecular Conformer Generation with SO(3)-Averaged Flow Matching and Reflow · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
normalizing flow |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Proteina: Scaling Flow-based Protein Structure Generative Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › protein design
protein structure generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Proteina: Scaling Flow-based Protein Structure Generative Models · ICLR 2025 |
Computational science and engineering
computational chemistry |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Efficient Molecular Conformer Generation with SO(3)-Averaged Flow Matching and Reflow · ICML 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › molecular modeling
molecular conformation generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Efficient Molecular Conformer Generation with SO(3)-Averaged Flow Matching and Reflow · ICML 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein design |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Proteina: Scaling Flow-based Protein Structure Generative Models · ICLR 2025 |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing
GPU training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimizing Data Distribution and Kernel Performance for Efficient Training of Chemistry Foundation Models: A Case Study with MACE · HPDC 2025 |
Computational science and engineering › model simulation › atomistic simulation
machine learning interatomic potential |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Tensor Decomposition Networks for Fast Machine Learning Interatomic Potential Computations · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
flow matching · 3.5transformer · 1.7tensor decomposition · 1.7reflow · 1.7path-weight sharing · 1.7distillation · 1.7classifier-free guidance · 1.7SO(3)-averaged flow · 1.7LoRA · 1.7CP decomposition · 1.7symmetric tensor contraction optimization · 0.9multi-objective bin packing · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Optimizing Data Distribution and Kernel Performance for Efficient Training of Chemistry Foundation Models: A Case Study with MACEabstractChemistry Foundation Models (CFMs) that leverage Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) operating on 3D molecular graph structures are becoming indispensable tools for computational chemists and materials scientists. These models facilitate the understanding of matter and the discovery of new molecules and materials. In contrast to GNNs operating on large homogeneous graphs, GNNs used by CFMs process a large number of geometric graphs of varying sizes, requiring different optimization strategies than those developed for large homogeneous GNNs. This paper presents optimizations for two critical phases of CFM training: data distribution and model training, targeting MACE - a state-of-the-art CFM. We address the challenge of load balancing in data distribution by formulating it as a multi-objective bin packing problem. We propose an iterative algorithm that provides a highly effective, fast, and practical solution, ensuring efficient data distribution. For the training phase, we identify symmetric tensor contraction as the key computational kernel in MACE and optimize this kernel to improve the overall performance. Our combined approach of balanced data distribution and kernel optimization significantly enhances the training process of MACE. Experimental results demonstrate a substantial speedup, reducing per-epoch execution time for training from 12 to 2 minutes on 740 GPUs with a 2.6M sample dataset. Jesun Sahariar Firoz, Franco Pellegrini, Mario Geiger, Darren Hsu, Jenna A. Bilbrey, Han-Yi Chou, Maximilian Stadler, Markus Höhnerbach, Tingyu Wang 0001, Dejun Lin, Emine Küçükbenli, Henry Sprueill, Ilyes Batatia, Sotiris S. Xantheas, MalSoon Lee, Christopher J. Mundy, Gábor Csányi, Justin S. Smith, P. Sadayappan, Sutanay Choudhury |
HPDC | 11 |
| 2025 | Proteina: Scaling Flow-based Protein Structure Generative ModelsabstractRecently, diffusion- and flow-based generative models of protein structures have emerged as a powerful tool for de novo protein design. Here, we develop *Proteina*, a new large-scale flow-based protein backbone generator that utilizes hierarchical fold class labels for conditioning and relies on a tailored scalable transformer architecture with up to $5\times$ as many parameters as previous models. To meaningfully quantify performance, we introduce a new set of metrics that directly measure the distributional similarity of generated proteins with reference sets, complementing existing metrics. We further explore scaling training data to millions of synthetic protein structures and explore improved training and sampling recipes adapted to protein backbone generation. This includes fine-tuning strategies like LoRA for protein backbones, new guidance methods like classifier-free guidance and autoguidance for protein backbones, and new adjusted training objectives. Proteina achieves state-of-the-art performance on de novo protein backbone design and produces diverse and designable proteins at unprecedented length, up to 800 residues. The hierarchical conditioning offers novel control, enabling high-level secondary-structure guidance as well as low-level fold-specific generation. Tomas Geffner, Kieran Didi, Zuobai Zhang, Danny Reidenbach, Zhonglin Cao, Jason Yim, Mario Geiger, Christian Dallago, Emine Küçükbenli, Arash Vahdat, Karsten Kreis |
ICLR | 9 |
| 2025 | Efficient Molecular Conformer Generation with SO(3)-Averaged Flow Matching and ReflowabstractFast and accurate generation of molecular conformers is desired for downstream computational chemistry and drug discovery tasks. Currently, training and sampling state-of-the-art diffusion or flow-based models for conformer generation require significant computational resources. In this work, we build upon flow-matching and propose two mechanisms for accelerating training and inference of generative models for 3D molecular conformer generation. For fast training, we introduce the SO(3)-*Averaged Flow* training objective, which leads to faster convergence to better generation quality compared to conditional optimal transport flow or Kabsch-aligned flow. We demonstrate that models trained using SO(3)-*Averaged Flow* can reach state-of-the-art conformer generation quality. For fast inference, we show that the reflow and distillation methods of flow-based models enable few-steps or even one-step molecular conformer generation with high quality. The training techniques proposed in this work show a path towards highly efficient molecular conformer generation with flow-based models. Zhonglin Cao, Mario Geiger, Allan dos Santos Costa, Danny Reidenbach, Karsten Kreis, Tomas Geffner, Franco Pellegrini, Emine Küçükbenli |
ICML | 9 |
| 2025 | Tensor Decomposition Networks for Fast Machine Learning Interatomic Potential ComputationsabstractSO(3)-equivariant networks are the dominant models for machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs). The key operation of such networks is the Clebsch-Gordan (CG) tensor product, which is computationally expensive. To accelerate the computation, we develop tensor decomposition networks (TDNs) as a class of approximately equivariant networks whose CG tensor products are replaced by low-rank tensor decompositions, such as the CANDECOMP/PARAFAC (CP) decomposition. With the CP decomposition, we prove (i) a uniform bound on the induced error of SO(3)-equivariance, and (ii) the universality of approximating any equivariant bilinear map. To further reduce the number of parameters, we propose path-weight sharing that ties all multiplicity-space weights across the O(L^3) CG paths into a single shared parameter set without compromising equivariance, where L is the maximum angular degree. The resulting layer acts as a plug-and-play replacement for tensor products in existing networks, and the computational complexity of tensor products is reduced from O(L^6) to O(L^4). We evaluate TDNs on PubChemQCR, a newly curated molecular relaxation dataset containing 105 million DFT-calculated snapshots. We also use existing datasets, including OC20, and OC22. Results show that TDNs achieve competitive performance with dramatic speedup in computations. Our code is publicly available as part of the AIRS library (https://github.com/divelab/AIRS). Yuchao Lin, Cong Fu 0003, Zachary Krueger, Haiyang Yu 0005, Maho Nakata, Jianwen Xie, Emine Küçükbenli, Xiaofeng Qian, Shuiwang Ji |
NeurIPS | 7 |