Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sanxing Chen
dblp:274/1027
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Language models and text generation · 39% Trustworthy machine learning · 20% Efficient and distributed learning · 16% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Identifying and Analyzing Performance-Critical Tokens in Large Language Models · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
language model interpretability |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Identifying and Analyzing Performance-Critical Tokens in Large Language Models · AAAI 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
factuality assessment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Real-time Factuality Assessment from Adversarial Feedback · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › trustworthy language model › large language model reliability
faithfulness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | To Trust or Not to Trust? Enhancing Large Language Models' Situated Faithfulness to External Contexts · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › retrieval-augmented generation
knowledge conflict |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | To Trust or Not to Trust? Enhancing Large Language Models' Situated Faithfulness to External Contexts · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | To Trust or Not to Trust? Enhancing Large Language Models' Situated Faithfulness to External Contexts · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Real-time Factuality Assessment from Adversarial Feedback · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CItruS: Chunked Instruction-aware State Eviction for Long Sequence Modeling · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › KV cache management
KV cache eviction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CItruS: Chunked Instruction-aware State Eviction for Long Sequence Modeling · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling
long sequence modeling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | CItruS: Chunked Instruction-aware State Eviction for Long Sequence Modeling · EMNLP 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge graph
knowledge graph embedding |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | HittER: Hierarchical Transformers for Knowledge Graph Embeddings · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Real-time Factuality Assessment from Adversarial Feedback · ACL (1) 2025 |
Information retrieval › document retrieval › text search
long document retrieval |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | CItruS: Chunked Instruction-aware State Eviction for Long Sequence Modeling · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › question answering
factoid question answering |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | HittER: Hierarchical Transformers for Knowledge Graph Embeddings · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
retrieval-augmented generation · 1.7adversarial feedback · 1.7chunked processing · 1.5attention preference integration · 1.5representation ablation · 1.0attention analysis · 1.0direct preference optimization · 0.9confidence reasoning · 0.9masked entity prediction · 0.5hierarchical transformer · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Identifying and Analyzing Performance-Critical Tokens in Large Language ModelsabstractIn-context learning (ICL) has emerged as an effective solution for few-shot learning with large language models (LLMs). However, how LLMs leverage demonstrations to specify a task and learn a corresponding computational function through ICL is underexplored. Drawing from the way humans learn from content-label mappings in demonstrations, we categorize the tokens in an ICL prompt into content, stopword, and template tokens. Our goal is to identify the types of tokens whose representations directly influence LLM's performance, a property we refer to as being performance-critical. By ablating representations from the attention of the test example, we find that the representations of informative content tokens have less influence on performance compared to template and stopword tokens, which contrasts with the human attention to informative words. We give evidence that the representations of performance-critical tokens aggregate information from the content tokens. Moreover, we demonstrate experimentally that lexical meaning, repetition, and structural cues are the main distinguishing characteristics of these tokens. Our work sheds light on how LLMs learn to perform tasks from demonstrations and deepens our understanding of the roles different types of tokens play in LLMs. Yu Bai 0018, Heyan Huang, Cesare Spinoso Di Piano, Sanxing Chen, Marc-Antoine Rondeau, Yang Gao 0016, Jackie Chi Kit Cheung |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2025 | Real-time Factuality Assessment from Adversarial FeedbackabstractWe show that existing evaluations for assessing the factuality of news from conventional sources, such as claims on fact-checking websites, result in high accuracies over time for LLM-based detectors-even after their knowledge cutoffs.This suggests that recent popular false information from such sources can be easily identified due to its likely presence in pretraining/retrieval corpora or the emergence of salient, yet shallow, patterns in these datasets.Instead, we argue that a proper factuality evaluation dataset should test a model's ability to reason about current events by retrieving and reading related evidence.To this end, we develop a novel pipeline that leverages natural language feedback from a RAG-based detector to iteratively modify real-time news into deceptive variants that challenge LLMs.Our iterative rewrite decreases the binary classification ROC-AUC by an absolute 17.5 percent for a strong RAG-based GPT-4o detector.Our experiments reveal the important role of RAG in both evaluating and generating challenging news examples, as retrieval-free LLM detectors are vulnerable to unseen events and adversarial attacks, while feedback from RAG-based evaluation helps discover more deceitful patterns. Sanxing Chen, Bhuwan Dhingra |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2025 | To Trust or Not to Trust? Enhancing Large Language Models' Situated Faithfulness to External ContextsabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) are often augmented with external contexts, such as those used in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). However, these contexts can be inaccurate or intentionally misleading, leading to conflicts with the model’s internal knowledge. We argue that robust LLMs should demonstrate situated faithfulness, dynamically calibrating their trust in external information based on their confidence in the internal knowledge and the external context to resolve knowledge conflicts. To benchmark this capability, we evaluate LLMs across several QA datasets, including a newly created dataset featuring in-the-wild incorrect contexts sourced from Reddit posts. We show that when provided with both correct and incorrect contexts, both open-source and proprietary models tend to overly rely on external information, regardless of its factual accuracy. To enhance situated faithfulness, we propose two approaches: Self-Guided Confidence Reasoning (SCR) and Rule-Based Confidence Reasoning (RCR). SCR enables models to self-access the confidence of external information relative to their own internal knowledge to produce the most accurate answer. RCR, in contrast, extracts explicit confidence signals from the LLM and determines the final answer using predefined rules.
Our results show that for LLMs with strong reasoning capabilities, such as GPT-4o and GPT-4o mini, SCR outperforms RCR, achieving improvements of up to 24.2\% over a direct input augmentation baseline. Conversely, for a smaller model like Llama-3-8B, RCR outperforms SCR. Fine-tuning SCR with our proposed Confidence Reasoning Direct Preference Optimization (CR-DPO) method improves performance on both seen and unseen datasets, yielding an average improvement of 8.9\% on Llama-3-8B. In addition to quantitative results, we offer insights into the relative strengths of SCR and RCR. Our findings highlight promising avenues for improving situated faithfulness in LLMs. Sanxing Chen, Hongyi Cai, Bhuwan Dhingra |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2024 | CItruS: Chunked Instruction-aware State Eviction for Long Sequence ModelingabstractLong sequence modeling has gained broad interest as large language models (LLMs) continue to advance.Recent research has identified that a large portion of hidden states within the key-value caches of Transformer models can be discarded (also termed evicted) without affecting the perplexity performance in generating long sequences.However, we show that these methods, despite preserving perplexity performance, often drop information that is important for solving downstream tasks, a problem which we call information neglect.To address this issue, we introduce Chunked Instruction-aware State Eviction (CItruS), a novel modeling technique that integrates the attention preferences useful for a downstream task into the eviction process of hidden states.In addition, we design a method for chunked sequence processing to further improve efficiency.Our training-free method exhibits superior performance on long sequence comprehension and retrieval tasks over several strong baselines under the same memory budget, while preserving language modeling perplexity.The code and data have been released at https: //github.com/ybai-nlp/CItruS. Yu Bai 0018, Xiyuan Zou, Heyan Huang, Sanxing Chen, Marc-Antoine Rondeau, Yang Gao 0016, Jackie Chi Kit Cheung |
EMNLP | 4 |
| 2021 | HittER: Hierarchical Transformers for Knowledge Graph EmbeddingsabstractThis paper examines the challenging problem of learning representations of entities and relations in a complex multi-relational knowledge graph.We propose HittER, a Hierarchical Transformer model to jointly learn Entityrelation composition and Relational contextualization based on a source entity's neighborhood.Our proposed model consists of two different Transformer blocks: the bottom block extracts features of each entity-relation pair in the local neighborhood of the source entity and the top block aggregates the relational information from outputs of the bottom block.We further design a masked entity prediction task to balance information from the relational context and the source entity itself.Experimental results show that HittER achieves new stateof-the-art results on multiple link prediction datasets.We additionally propose a simple approach to integrate HittER into BERT and demonstrate its effectiveness on two Freebase factoid question answering datasets. Sanxing Chen, Xiaodong Liu 0003, Jianfeng Gao 0001, Jian Jiao 0007, Ruofei Zhang, Yangfeng Ji |
EMNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2020 | A Tale of Two Linkings: Dynamically Gating between Schema Linking and Structural Linking for Text-to-SQL ParsingabstractIn Text-to-SQL semantic parsing, selecting the correct entities (tables and columns) for the generated SQL query is both crucial and challenging; the parser is required to connect the natural language (NL) question and the SQL query to the structured knowledge in the database.We formulate two linking processes to address this challenge: schema linking which links explicit NL mentions to the database and structural linking which links the entities in the output SQL with their structural relationships in the database schema.Intuitively, the effectiveness of these two linking processes changes based on the entity being generated, thus we propose to dynamically choose between them using a gating mechanism.Integrating the proposed method with two graph neural network-based semantic parsers together with BERT representations demonstrates substantial gains in parsing accuracy on the challenging Spider dataset.Analyses show that our proposed method helps to enhance the structure of the model output when generating complicated SQL queries and offers more explainable predictions. Sanxing Chen, Aidan San, Xiaodong Liu 0003, Yangfeng Ji |
COLING | 1 |