Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mike A. Merrill

dblp:274/1060 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-2994-0058ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Language models and text generation · 28% Time series and sequential data · 21% Deep learning architectures and training · 21%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Wearable and physiological sensing · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › large language model for time series
LLM-based time series forecasting
0.812024
Are Language Models Actually Useful for Time Series Forecasting? · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain generalization
0.612022
GLOBEM Dataset: Multi-Year Datasets for Longitudinal Human Behavior Modeling Generalization · NeurIPS 2022
Medical and health informatics › mental health informatics
depression detection
0.612022
GLOBEM Dataset: Multi-Year Datasets for Longitudinal Human Behavior Modeling Generalization · NeurIPS 2022
Medical and health informatics › mental health informatics
mental health monitoring
0.612022
GLOBEM Dataset: Multi-Year Datasets for Longitudinal Human Behavior Modeling Generalization · NeurIPS 2022
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
temporal information extraction
0.312026
Inferring Events from Time Series using Language Models · ACL (1) 2026
Data mining
mining software repositories
0.112021
MULTIVERSE: Mining Collective Data Science Knowledge from Code on the Web to Suggest Alternative Analysis Approaches · KDD 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

passive sensing · 1.7benchmark evaluation · 1.7language model · 1.0code mining · 1.0attention layer replacement · 0.8ablation study · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Inferring Events from Time Series using Language Models
abstract
Mingtian Tan, Mike A Merrill, Zachary Gottesman, Tim Althoff, David Evans, Thomas Hartvigsen. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Mingtian Tan, Mike A. Merrill, Zachary Gottesman, Tim Althoff, Thomas Hartvigsen
ACL (1)2
2024 Are Language Models Actually Useful for Time Series Forecasting?
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are being applied to time series forecasting. But are language models actually useful for time series? In a series of ablation studies on three recent and popular LLM-based time series forecasting methods, we find that removing the LLM component or replacing it with a basic attention layer does not degrade forecasting performance---in most cases, the results even improve! We also find that despite their significant computational cost, pretrained LLMs do no better than models trained from scratch, do not represent the sequential dependencies in time series, and do not assist in few-shot settings. Additionally, we explore time series encoders and find that patching and attention structures perform similarly to LLM-based forecasters. All resources needed to reproduce our work are available: https://github.com/BennyTMT/LLMsForTimeSeries.
Mingtian Tan, Mike A. Merrill, Tim Althoff, Thomas Hartvigsen
NeurIPS2
2022 GLOBEM Dataset: Multi-Year Datasets for Longitudinal Human Behavior Modeling Generalization
abstract
Recent research has demonstrated the capability of behavior signals captured by smartphones and wearables for longitudinal behavior modeling. However, there is a lack of a comprehensive public dataset that serves as an open testbed for fair comparison among algorithms. Moreover, prior studies mainly evaluate algorithms using data from a single population within a short period, without measuring the cross-dataset generalizability of these algorithms. We present the first multi-year passive sensing datasets, containing over 700 user-years and 497 unique users’ data collected from mobile and wearable sensors, together with a wide range of well-being metrics. Our datasets can support multiple cross-dataset evaluations of behavior modeling algorithms’ generalizability across different users and years. As a starting point, we provide the benchmark results of 18 algorithms on the task of depression detection. Our results indicate that both prior depression detection algorithms and domain generalization techniques show potential but need further research to achieve adequate cross-dataset generalizability. We envision our multi-year datasets can support the ML community in developing generalizable longitudinal behavior modeling algorithms.
Xuhai Xu, Han Zhang 0004, Yasaman S. Sefidgar, Yiyi Ren, Xin Liu 0034, Woosuk Seo, Kevin S. Kuehn, Mike A. Merrill, Paula S. Nurius, Shwetak N. Patel, Tim Althoff, Margaret E. Morris, Eve A. Riskin, Jennifer Mankoff, Anind K. Dey
NeurIPS9
2021 MULTIVERSE: Mining Collective Data Science Knowledge from Code on the Web to Suggest Alternative Analysis Approaches
abstract
Data analyses are based on a series of "decision points" including data filtering, feature operationalization and selection, model specification, and parametric assumptions. "Multiverse Analysis" research has shown that a lack of exploration of these decisions can lead to non-robust conclusions based on highly sensitive decision points. Importantly, even if myopic analyses are technically correct, analysts' focus on one set of decision points precludes them from exploring alternate formulations that may produce very different results. Prior work has also shown that analysts' exploration is often limited based on their training, domain, and personal experience. However, supporting analysts in exploring alternative approaches is challenging and typically requires expert feedback that is costly and hard to scale.
Mike A. Merrill, Tim Althoff
KDD1