This paper proposes Blenda, a dynamically-partitioned memory-cache blend architecture for giga-scale die-stacked DRAMs. Blenda architects the stacked DRAM partly as memory and partly as cache, and dynamically adjusts each part's size to workloads' demands. The memory part hosts hot data objects and serves requests to them efficiently (i.e., without metadata overheads). The cache part captures transient data and filters requests to bandwidth-limited off-chip DRAM. Blenda provides three key contributions: (i) Blenda partitions stacked DRAM's capacity in a workload-aware manner: different workloads enjoy different memory-cache configurations. (ii) Blenda is reactive: the configuration is adjusted to workloads' phases dynamically and application-transparently: no reboot or user involvement are needed. (iii) Blenda gracefully transitions among configurations: no data invalidation is required upon most reconfigurations. We simulate 15 diverse big-data workloads running on a state-of-the-art processor and show that Blenda outperforms the best-performing prior architecture by 34%. Blenda's total storage overhead is less than 100 bytes per core.

L1 instruction(L1-l) cache misses are a source of performance bottleneck. While many instruction prefetchers have been proposed, most of them leave a considerable potential uncovered. In 2011, Proactive Instruction Fetch (PIF) showed that a hardware prefetcher could effectively eliminate all instruction-cache misses. However, its enormous storage cost makes it impractical. Consequently, reducing the storage cost was the main research focus in instruction prefetching in the past decade. Several instruction prefetchers, including RDIP and Shotgun, were proposed to offer PIF-level performance with significantly lower storage overhead. However, our findings show that there is a considerable performance gap between these proposals and PIF. While these proposals use different mechanisms for prefetching, the performance gap is mainly not because of the mechanism, and instead, is due to not having sufficient storage. We make the case that the key to designing a powerful and cost-effective instruction prefetcher is choosing a metadata record and microarchitecting the prefetcher to minimize the storage. Our proposal, MANA, offers PIF-level performance with 15.7x lower storage cost. MANA outperforms RDIP and Shotgun by 12.5 and 29%, respectively. We also evaluate a version of MANA with no storage overhead and show that it offers 98% of the peak performance benefits.