Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Paul Hagemann

dblp:274/2221 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Generative modeling · 67% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 22% Optimization for machine learning · 10%
Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching
1.722025
Conditional Wasserstein Distances with Applications in Bayesian OT Flow Matching · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
PnP-Flow: Plug-and-Play Image Restoration with Flow Matching · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › posterior inference
bayesian inverse problems
0.912025
Conditional Wasserstein Distances with Applications in Bayesian OT Flow Matching · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network
Wasserstein GAN
0.912025
Conditional Wasserstein Distances with Applications in Bayesian OT Flow Matching · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025
Image and video processing
image restoration
0.912025
PnP-Flow: Plug-and-Play Image Restoration with Flow Matching · ICLR 2025
Image and video processing › image restoration › regularized image restoration
plug-and-play image restoration
0.912025
PnP-Flow: Plug-and-Play Image Restoration with Flow Matching · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
conditional generative model
0.812024
Posterior Sampling Based on Gradient Flows of the MMD with Negative Distance Kernel · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling
image generation
0.812024
Generative Sliced MMD Flows with Riesz Kernels · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
posterior sampling
0.812024
Posterior Sampling Based on Gradient Flows of the MMD with Negative Distance Kernel · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient flow
wasserstein gradient flow
0.812024
Posterior Sampling Based on Gradient Flows of the MMD with Negative Distance Kernel · ICLR 2024
Image and video processing › image restoration
inverse problem
0.212024
Posterior Sampling Based on Gradient Flows of the MMD with Negative Distance Kernel · ICLR 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

plug-and-play · 1.7gradient descent · 1.7flow matching · 1.7wasserstein gradient flow · 1.5negative distance kernel · 1.5maximum mean discrepancy · 1.5wasserstein distance · 0.9optimal transport · 0.9conditional generative model · 0.9MMD flows · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 PnP-Flow: Plug-and-Play Image Restoration with Flow Matching
abstract
In this paper, we introduce Plug-and-Play (PnP) Flow Matching, an algorithm for solving imaging inverse problems. PnP methods leverage the strength of pre-trained denoisers, often deep neural networks, by integrating them in optimization schemes. While they achieve state-of-the-art performance on various inverse problems in imaging, PnP approaches face inherent limitations on more generative tasks like inpainting. On the other hand, generative models such as Flow Matching pushed the boundary in image sampling yet lack a clear method for efficient use in image restoration. We propose to combine the PnP framework with Flow Matching (FM) by defining a time-dependent denoiser using a pre-trained FM model. Our algorithm alternates between gradient descent steps on the data-fidelity term, reprojections onto the learned FM path, and denoising. Notably, our method is computationally efficient and memory-friendly, as it avoids backpropagation through ODEs and trace computations. We evaluate its performance on denoising, super-resolution, deblurring, and inpainting tasks, demonstrating superior results compared to existing PnP algorithms and Flow Matching based state-of-the-art methods. Code available at https://github.com/annegnx/PnP-Flow.
Ségolène Martin, Anne Gagneux, Paul Hagemann, Gabriele Steidl
ICLR3
2025 Conditional Wasserstein Distances with Applications in Bayesian OT Flow Matching
abstract
In inverse problems, many conditional generative models approximate the posterior measure by minimizing a distance between the joint measure and its learned approximation. While this approach also controls the distance between the posterior measures in the case of the Kullback–Leibler divergence, the same in general does not hold true for the Wasserstein distance. In this paper, we introduce a conditional Wasserstein distance via a set of restricted couplings that equals the expected Wasserstein distance of the posteriors. Interestingly, the dual formulation of the conditional Wasserstein-1 distance resembles losses in the conditional Wasserstein GAN literature in a quite natural way. We derive theoretical properties of the conditional Wasserstein distance, characterize the corresponding geodesics and velocity fields as well as the flow ODEs. Subsequently, we propose to approximate the velocity fields by relaxing the conditional Wasserstein distance. Based on this, we propose an extension of OT Flow Matching for solving Bayesian inverse problems and demonstrate its numerical advantages on an inverse problem and class-conditional image generation.
Jannis Chemseddine, Paul Hagemann, Gabriele Steidl, Christian Wald
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2024 Posterior Sampling Based on Gradient Flows of the MMD with Negative Distance Kernel
abstract
We propose conditional flows of the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) with the negative distance kernel for posterior sampling and conditional generative modelling. This MMD, which is also known as energy distance, has several advantageous properties like efficient computation via slicing and sorting. We approximate the joint distribution of the ground truth and the observations using discrete Wasserstein gradient flows and establish an error bound for the posterior distributions. Further, we prove that our particle flow is indeed a Wasserstein gradient flow of an appropriate functional. The power of our method is demonstrated by numerical examples including conditional image generation and inverse problems like superresolution, inpainting and computed tomography in low-dose and limited-angle settings.
Paul Hagemann, Johannes Hertrich, Fabian Altekrüger, Robert Beinert, Jannis Chemseddine, Gabriele Steidl
ICLR1
2024 Generative Sliced MMD Flows with Riesz Kernels
abstract
Maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) flows suffer from high computational costs in large scale computations. In this paper, we show that MMD flows with Riesz kernels $K(x,y) = - \|x-y\|^r$, $r \in (0,2)$ have exceptional properties which allow their efficient computation. We prove that the MMD of Riesz kernels, which is also known as energy distance, coincides with the MMD of their sliced version. As a consequence, the computation of gradients of MMDs can be performed in the one-dimensional setting. Here, for $r=1$, a simple sorting algorithm can be applied to reduce the complexity from $O(MN+N^2)$ to $O((M+N)\log(M+N))$ for two measures with $M$ and $N$ support points. As another interesting follow-up result, the MMD of compactly supported measures can be estimated from above and below by the Wasserstein-1 distance. For the implementations we approximate the gradient of the sliced MMD by using only a finite number $P$ of slices. We show that the resulting error has complexity \smash{$O(\sqrt{d/P})$}, where $d$ is the data dimension. These results enable us to train generative models by approximating MMD gradient flows by neural networks even for image applications. We demonstrate the efficiency of our model by image generation on MNIST, FashionMNIST and CIFAR10.
Johannes Hertrich, Christian Wald, Fabian Altekrüger, Paul Hagemann
ICLR4