Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Millicent Li

dblp:274/4138 · also Millicent L. Li · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 40% Language models and text generation · 20% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 20%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
document retrieval
0.912025
Multi-Field Adaptive Retrieval · ICLR 2025
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.912025
Multi-Field Adaptive Retrieval · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › mechanistic interpretability
function vectors
0.812024
Function Vectors in Large Language Models · ICLR 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning
0.812024
Function Vectors in Large Language Models · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
mechanistic interpretability
0.812024
Function Vectors in Large Language Models · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal effect estimation
mediation analysis
0.812024
Function Vectors in Large Language Models · ICLR 2024
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation
0.312025
Multi-Field Adaptive Retrieval · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lexical retrieval · 0.9dense retrieval · 0.9adaptive field weighting · 0.9causal mediation analysis · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Multi-Field Adaptive Retrieval
abstract
Document retrieval for tasks such as search and retrieval-augmented generation typically involves datasets that are _unstructured_: free-form text without explicit internal structure in each document. However, documents can have some structure, containing fields such as an article title, a message body, or an HTML header. To address this gap, we introduce Multi-Field Adaptive Retrieval (mFAR), a flexible framework that accommodates any number and any type of document indices on _semi-structured_ data. Our framework consists of two main steps: (1) the decomposition of an existing document into fields, each indexed independently through dense and lexical methods, and (2) learning a model which adaptively predicts the importance of a field by conditioning on the document query, allowing on-the-fly weighting of the most likely field(s). We find that our approach allows for the optimized use of dense versus lexical representations across field types, significantly improves in document ranking over a number of existing retrievers, and achieves state-of-the-art performance for multi-field structured data.
Millicent Li, Tongfei Chen, Benjamin Van Durme, Patrick Xia 0002
ICLR1
2024 Function Vectors in Large Language Models
abstract
We report the presence of a simple neural mechanism that represents an input-output function as a vector within autoregressive transformer language models (LMs). Using causal mediation analysis on a diverse range of in-context-learning (ICL) tasks, we find that a small number attention heads transport a compact representation of the demonstrated task, which we call a function vector (FV). FVs are robust to changes in context, i.e., they trigger execution of the task on inputs such as zero-shot and natural text settings that do not resemble the ICL contexts from which they are collected. We test FVs across a range of tasks, models, and layers and find strong causal effects across settings in middle layers. We investigate the internal structure of FVs and find while that they often contain information that encodes the output space of the function, this information alone is not sufficient to reconstruct an FV. Finally, we test semantic vector composition in FVs, and find that to some extent they can be summed to create vectors that trigger new complex tasks. Our findings show that compact, causal internal vector representations of function abstractions can be explicitly extracted from LLMs.
Eric Todd, Millicent Li, Arnab Sen Sharma, Aaron Mueller, Byron C. Wallace, David Bau
ICLR2