Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Millicent Li
dblp:274/4138 · also Millicent L. Li
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 40% Language models and text generation · 20% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 20% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval
document retrieval |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Multi-Field Adaptive Retrieval · ICLR 2025 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Multi-Field Adaptive Retrieval · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › mechanistic interpretability
function vectors |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Function Vectors in Large Language Models · ICLR 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Function Vectors in Large Language Models · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
mechanistic interpretability |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Function Vectors in Large Language Models · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal effect estimation
mediation analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Function Vectors in Large Language Models · ICLR 2024 |
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Multi-Field Adaptive Retrieval · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
lexical retrieval · 0.9dense retrieval · 0.9adaptive field weighting · 0.9causal mediation analysis · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Multi-Field Adaptive RetrievalabstractDocument retrieval for tasks such as search and retrieval-augmented generation typically involves datasets that are _unstructured_: free-form text without explicit internal structure in each document. However, documents can have some structure, containing fields such as an article title, a message body, or an HTML header. To address this gap, we introduce Multi-Field Adaptive Retrieval (mFAR), a flexible framework that accommodates any number and any type of document indices on _semi-structured_ data. Our framework consists of two main steps: (1) the decomposition of an existing document into fields, each indexed independently through dense and lexical methods, and (2) learning a model which adaptively predicts the importance of a field by conditioning on the document query, allowing on-the-fly weighting of the most likely field(s). We find that our approach allows for the optimized use of dense versus lexical representations across field types, significantly improves in document ranking over a number of existing retrievers, and achieves state-of-the-art performance for multi-field structured data. Millicent Li, Tongfei Chen, Benjamin Van Durme, Patrick Xia 0002 |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2024 | Function Vectors in Large Language ModelsabstractWe report the presence of a simple neural mechanism that represents an input-output function as a vector within autoregressive transformer language models (LMs). Using causal mediation analysis on a diverse range of in-context-learning (ICL) tasks, we find that a small number attention heads transport a compact representation of the demonstrated task, which we call a function vector (FV). FVs are robust to changes in context, i.e., they trigger execution of the task on inputs such as zero-shot and natural text settings that do not resemble the ICL contexts from which they are collected. We test FVs across a range of tasks, models, and layers and find strong causal effects across settings in middle layers. We investigate the internal structure of FVs and find while that they often contain information that encodes the output space of the function, this information alone is not sufficient to reconstruct an FV. Finally, we test semantic vector composition in FVs, and find that to some extent they can be summed to create vectors that trigger new complex tasks. Our findings show that compact, causal internal vector representations of function abstractions can be explicitly extracted from LLMs. Eric Todd, Millicent Li, Arnab Sen Sharma, Aaron Mueller, Byron C. Wallace, David Bau |
ICLR | 2 |