Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Frank Hu
dblp:274/4323
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 75% Reinforcement learning · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
autoregressive model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Aligning Transformers with Continuous Feedback via Energy Rank Alignment · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
molecular generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Aligning Transformers with Continuous Feedback via Energy Rank Alignment · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Aligning Transformers with Continuous Feedback via Energy Rank Alignment · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › protein design
protein sequence generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Aligning Transformers with Continuous Feedback via Energy Rank Alignment · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
proximal policy optimization · 0.9gibbs-boltzmann distribution · 0.9energy rank alignment · 0.9direct preference optimization · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Aligning Transformers with Continuous Feedback via Energy Rank AlignmentabstractSearching through chemical space is an exceptionally challenging problem because the number of possible molecules grows combinatorially with the number of atoms. Large, autoregressive models trained on databases of chemical compounds have yielded powerful generators, but we still lack robust strategies for generating molecules with desired properties. This molecular search problem closely resembles the "alignment" problem for large language models, though for many chemical tasks we have a specific and easily evaluable reward function. Here, we introduce an algorithm called energy rank alignment (ERA) that leverages an explicit reward function to produce a gradient-based objective that we use to optimize autoregressive policies.
We show theoretically that this algorithm is closely related to proximal policy optimization (PPO) and direct preference optimization (DPO), but has a minimizer that converges to an ideal Gibbs-Boltzmann distribution with the reward playing the role of an energy function.
Furthermore, this algorithm is highly scalable, does not require reinforcement learning, and performs well relative to DPO when the number of preference observations per pairing is small. We deploy this approach to align molecular transformers and protein language models to generate molecules and protein sequences, respectively, with externally specified
properties and find that it does so robustly, searching through diverse parts of chemical space. Shriram Chennakesavalu, Frank Hu, Sebastian Ibarraran, Grant M. Rotskoff |
NeurIPS | 2 |