Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Fabrice Harel-Canada
dblp:274/6818
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0002-2431-4824ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 56% Trustworthy machine learning · 44% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Digital forensics and information hiding · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Digital forensics and information hiding
watermarking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sandcastles in the Storm: Revisiting the (Im)possibility of Strong Watermarking · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Measuring Psychological Depth in Language Models · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Measuring Psychological Depth in Language Models · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation › LLM behavior analysis
psycholinguistic evaluation of language models |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Measuring Psychological Depth in Language Models · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Is neuron coverage a meaningful measure for testing deep neural networks? · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2020 |
Software testing
deep learning testing |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Is neuron coverage a meaningful measure for testing deep neural networks? · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2020 |
Software testing › test adequacy › coverage criteria
neuron coverage |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Is neuron coverage a meaningful measure for testing deep neural networks? · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
diversity promoting regularizer · 0.9adversarial attack · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Sandcastles in the Storm: Revisiting the (Im)possibility of Strong WatermarkingabstractFabrice Y Harel-Canada, Boran Erol, Connor Choi, Jason Liu, Gary Jiarui Song, Nanyun Peng, Amit Sahai. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Fabrice Harel-Canada, Boran Erol, Connor Choi, Gary Jiarui Song, Nanyun Peng 0001, Amit Sahai |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2024 | Measuring Psychological Depth in Language ModelsabstractFabrice Y Harel-Canada, Hanyu Zhou, Sreya Muppalla, Zeynep Senahan Yildiz, Miryung Kim, Amit Sahai, Nanyun Peng. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2024. Fabrice Harel-Canada, Hanyu Zhou, Sreya Muppalla, Zeynep Yildiz, Miryung Kim, Amit Sahai, Nanyun Peng 0001 |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2020 | Is neuron coverage a meaningful measure for testing deep neural networks?abstractRecent effort to test deep learning systems has produced an intuitive and compelling test criterion called neuron coverage (NC), which resembles the notion of traditional code coverage. NC measures the proportion of neurons activated in a neural network and it is implicitly assumed that increasing NC improves the quality of a test suite. In an attempt to automatically generate a test suite that increases NC, we design a novel diversity promoting regularizer that can be plugged into existing adversarial attack algorithms. We then assess whether such attempts to increase NC could generate a test suite that (1) detects adversarial attacks successfully, (2) produces natural inputs, and (3) is unbiased to particular class predictions. Contrary to expectation, our extensive evaluation finds that increasing NC actually makes it harder to generate an effective test suite: higher neuron coverage leads to fewer defects detected, less natural inputs, and more biased prediction preferences. Our results invoke skepticism that increasing neuron coverage may not be a meaningful objective for generating tests for deep neural networks and call for a new test generation technique that considers defect detection, naturalness, and output impartiality in tandem. Fabrice Harel-Canada, Lingxiao Wang 0001, Muhammad Ali Gulzar, Quanquan Gu, Miryung Kim |
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE | 1 |