Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sarah Jabbour

dblp:274/6919 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-0808-4662ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 78% Image recognition and object detection · 22%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.812024
DEPICT: Diffusion-Enabled Permutation Importance for Image Classification Tasks · ECCV (64) 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.812024
DEPICT: Diffusion-Enabled Permutation Importance for Image Classification Tasks · ECCV (64) 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › feature importance
permutation importance
0.812024
DEPICT: Diffusion-Enabled Permutation Importance for Image Classification Tasks · ECCV (64) 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › shortcut learning
shortcut learning mitigation
0.612022
Learning Concept Credible Models for Mitigating Shortcuts · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › spurious correlation
spurious correlation robustness
0.612022
Learning Concept Credible Models for Mitigating Shortcuts · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

diffusion model · 0.8two-stage learning · 0.6concept-based regularization · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 DEPICT: Diffusion-Enabled Permutation Importance for Image Classification Tasks
Sarah Jabbour, Gregory Kondas, Ella Kazerooni, Michael W. Sjoding, David F. Fouhey, Jenna Wiens
ECCV (64)1
2022 Learning Concept Credible Models for Mitigating Shortcuts
abstract
During training, models can exploit spurious correlations as shortcuts, resulting in poor generalization performance when shortcuts do not persist. In this work, assuming access to a representation based on domain knowledge (i.e., known concepts) that is invariant to shortcuts, we aim to learn robust and accurate models from biased training data. In contrast to previous work, we do not rely solely on known concepts, but allow the model to also learn unknown concepts. We propose two approaches for mitigating shortcuts that incorporate domain knowledge, while accounting for potentially important yet unknown concepts. The first approach is two-staged. After fitting a model using known concepts, it accounts for the residual using unknown concepts. While flexible, we show that this approach is vulnerable when shortcuts are correlated with the unknown concepts. This limitation is addressed by our second approach that extends a recently proposed regularization penalty. Applied to two real-world datasets, we demonstrate that both approaches can successfully mitigate shortcut learning.
Sarah Jabbour, Maggie Makar, Michael W. Sjoding, Jenna Wiens
NeurIPS2
2022 Combining chest X-rays and electronic health record (EHR) data using machine learning to diagnose acute respiratory failure
abstract
OBJECTIVE: When patients develop acute respiratory failure (ARF), accurately identifying the underlying etiology is essential for determining the best treatment. However, differentiating between common medical diagnoses can be challenging in clinical practice. Machine learning models could improve medical diagnosis by aiding in the diagnostic evaluation of these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Machine learning models were trained to predict the common causes of ARF (pneumonia, heart failure, and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]). Models were trained using chest radiographs and clinical data from the electronic health record (EHR) and applied to an internal and external cohort. RESULTS: The internal cohort of 1618 patients included 508 (31%) with pneumonia, 363 (22%) with heart failure, and 137 (8%) with COPD based on physician chart review. A model combining chest radiographs and EHR data outperformed models based on each modality alone. Models had similar or better performance compared to a randomly selected physician reviewer. For pneumonia, the combined model area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was 0.79 (0.77-0.79), image model AUROC was 0.74 (0.72-0.75), and EHR model AUROC was 0.74 (0.70-0.76). For heart failure, combined: 0.83 (0.77-0.84), image: 0.80 (0.71-0.81), and EHR: 0.79 (0.75-0.82). For COPD, combined: AUROC = 0.88 (0.83-0.91), image: 0.83 (0.77-0.89), and EHR: 0.80 (0.76-0.84). In the external cohort, performance was consistent for heart failure and increased for COPD, but declined slightly for pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning models combining chest radiographs and EHR data can accurately differentiate between common causes of ARF. Further work is needed to determine how these models could act as a diagnostic aid to clinicians in clinical settings.
Sarah Jabbour, David F. Fouhey, Ella Kazerooni, Jenna Wiens, Michael W. Sjoding
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc.1