Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gilles Bareilles

dblp:274/8429 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-6389-1767ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 43% Trustworthy machine learning · 35% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 16%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training › robust distributed learning
byzantine-robust distributed learning
1.012026
Brief Announcement: Byzantine Machine Learning, MultiKrum and an Optimal Notion of Robustness · PODC 2026
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning › model aggregation
robust aggregation
1.012026
Brief Announcement: Byzantine Machine Learning, MultiKrum and an Optimal Notion of Robustness · PODC 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
1.012026
Brief Announcement: Byzantine Machine Learning, MultiKrum and an Optimal Notion of Robustness · PODC 2026
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured prediction › ranking model
bradley-terry model
0.912025
Generalizing while preserving monotonicity in comparison-based preference learning models · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning
0.312026
Brief Announcement: Byzantine Machine Learning, MultiKrum and an Optimal Notion of Robustness · PODC 2026
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
diffusion prior
0.312025
Generalizing while preserving monotonicity in comparison-based preference learning models · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

robust mean estimation · 1.0convergence analysis · 1.0embedding conditions · 0.9diffusion prior · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Brief Announcement: Byzantine Machine Learning, MultiKrum and an Optimal Notion of Robustness
abstract
Aggregation rules are the cornerstone of distributed (or federated) learning in the presence of adversaries, under the so-called Byzantine threat model. They are also interesting mathematical objects from the point of view of robust mean estimation. The Krum aggregation rule has been extensively studied, and endowed with formal robustness and convergence guarantees. Yet, MultiKrum, a natural extension of Krum, is often preferred in practice for its superior empirical performance, even though no theoretical guarantees were available until now. In this work, we provide the first proof that MultiKrum is a robust aggregation rule, and bound its robustness coefficient. To do so, we introduce κ*, the optimal robustness coefficient of an aggregation rule, which quantifies the accuracy of mean estimation in the presence of adversaries in a tighter manner compared with previously adopted notions of robustness. We then construct an upper and a lower bound on MultiKrum's robustness coefficient. As a by-product, we also improve on the best-known bounds on Krum's robustness coefficient. We show that MultiKrum's bounds are never worse than Krum's, and better in realistic regimes. In the full paper, we also illustrate this analysis by an experimental investigation on the quality of the lower bound.
Gilles Bareilles, Wassim Bouaziz, Julien Fageot, El Mahdi El Mhamdi
PODC1
2025 Generalizing while preserving monotonicity in comparison-based preference learning models
abstract
If you tell a learning model that you prefer an alternative $a$ over another alternative $b$, then you probably expect the model to be *monotone*, that is, the valuation of $a$ increases, and that of $b$ decreases. Yet, perhaps surprisingly, many widely deployed comparison-based preference learning models, including large language models, fail to have this guarantee. Until now, the only comparison-based preference learning algorithms that were proved to be monotone are the Generalized Bradley-Terry models. Yet, these models are unable to generalize to uncompared data. In this paper, we advance the understanding of the set of models with generalization ability that are *monotone*. Namely, we propose a new class of Linear Generalized Bradley-Terry models with Diffusion Priors, and identify sufficient conditions on alternatives' embeddings that guarantee monotonicity. Our experiments show that this monotonicity is far from being a general guarantee, and that our new class of generalizing models improves accuracy, especially when the dataset is limited.
Julien Fageot, Peva Blanchard, Gilles Bareilles, Lê-Nguyên Hoang
NeurIPS3