Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Manuel Beyeler
dblp:275/2921
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design
auction design |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | iMLCA: Machine Learning-powered Iterative Combinatorial Auctions with Interval Bidding · EC 2021 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › auction theory
combinatorial auction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | iMLCA: Machine Learning-powered Iterative Combinatorial Auctions with Interval Bidding · EC 2021 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › auction theory › combinatorial auction
iterative combinatorial auction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | iMLCA: Machine Learning-powered Iterative Combinatorial Auctions with Interval Bidding · EC 2021 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
preference elicitation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | iMLCA: Machine Learning-powered Iterative Combinatorial Auctions with Interval Bidding · EC 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
price-based activity rule · 0.5machine learning · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | iMLCA: Machine Learning-powered Iterative Combinatorial Auctions with Interval BiddingabstractWe study the design of iterative combinatorial auctions for domains with a large number of items. In such domains, preference elicitation is a major challenge because the bundle space grows exponentially in the number of items. To keep preference elicitation manageable, recent work has employed machine learning (ML) algorithms that identify a small set of bundles to query from each bidder. However, a major limitation of this prior work is that bidders must submit exact values for the queried bundles, which can be quite costly for them. To address this, we propose iMLCA, a new ML-powered auction with interval bidding (i.e., where bidders submit upper and lower bounds for the queried bundles). To steer the auction towards an efficient allocation, we introduce a new price-based activity rule, asking bidders to tighten bounds on relevant bundles only. The activity rule is designed such that the auctioneer receives enough information about bidders' preferences to achieve high efficiency and good incentives, while minimizing elicitation costs. Our experiments show that iMLCA, despite only eliciting interval bids, achieves almost the same allocative efficiency as the prior auction design that required bidders to submit exact values. Finally, we show that iMLCA beats the well-known combinatorial clock auction in a realistically-sized domain. Manuel Beyeler, Gianluca Brero, Benjamin Lubin, Sven Seuken |
EC | 1 |