Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marius-Constantin Dinu

dblp:275/3387 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Learning theory · 29% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 20% Optimization for machine learning · 20%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
unsupervised domain adaptation
1.222023
Addressing Parameter Choice Issues in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Aggregation · ICLR 2023
The balancing principle for parameter choice in distance-regularized domain adaptation · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization
0.712023
Addressing Parameter Choice Issues in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Aggregation · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory › model selection
parameter selection
0.712023
Addressing Parameter Choice Issues in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Aggregation · ICLR 2023
Robotics › Robot manipulation
learning from demonstration
0.612022
Align-RUDDER: Learning From Few Demonstrations by Reward Redistribution · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward design › reward shaping
reward redistribution
0.612022
Align-RUDDER: Learning From Few Demonstrations by Reward Redistribution · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward design
reward shaping
0.612022
Align-RUDDER: Learning From Few Demonstrations by Reward Redistribution · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.512021
The balancing principle for parameter choice in distance-regularized domain adaptation · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › hyperparameter optimization
regularization parameter selection
0.512021
The balancing principle for parameter choice in distance-regularized domain adaptation · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization error
target error bound
0.512021
The balancing principle for parameter choice in distance-regularized domain adaptation · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

aggregation · 0.7profile model · 0.6multiple sequence alignment · 0.6regularization · 0.5inverse problem · 0.5balancing principle · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Addressing Parameter Choice Issues in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Aggregation
Marius-Constantin Dinu, Markus Holzleitner, Maximilian Beck, Hoan Duc Nguyen, Andrea Huber, Hamid Eghbalzadeh, Bernhard Moser 0001, Sergei V. Pereverzyev, Sepp Hochreiter, Werner Zellinger
ICLR1
2022 Align-RUDDER: Learning From Few Demonstrations by Reward Redistribution
abstract
Reinforcement learning algorithms require many samples when solving complex hierarchical tasks with sparse and delayed rewards. For such complex tasks, the recently proposed RUDDER uses reward redistribution to leverage steps in the Q-function that are associated with accomplishing sub-tasks. However, often only few episodes with high rewards are available as demonstrations since current exploration strategies cannot discover them in reasonable time. In this work, we introduce Align-RUDDER, which utilizes a profile model for reward redistribution that is obtained from multiple sequence alignment of demonstrations. Consequently, Align-RUDDER employs reward redistribution effectively and, thereby, drastically improves learning on few demonstrations. Align-RUDDER outperforms competitors on complex artificial tasks with delayed rewards and few demonstrations. On the Minecraft ObtainDiamond task, Align-RUDDER is able to mine a diamond, though not frequently. Code is available at github.com/ml-jku/align-rudder.
Vihang Patil, Markus Hofmarcher, Marius-Constantin Dinu, Matthias Dorfer, Patrick M. Blies, Johannes Brandstetter, Jose A. Arjona-Medina, Sepp Hochreiter
ICML3
2021 The balancing principle for parameter choice in distance-regularized domain adaptation
abstract
We address the unsolved algorithm design problem of choosing a justified regularization parameter in unsupervised domain adaptation. This problem is intriguing as no labels are available in the target domain. Our approach starts with the observation that the widely-used method of minimizing the source error, penalized by a distance measure between source and target feature representations, shares characteristics with regularized ill-posed inverse problems. Regularization parameters in inverse problems are optimally chosen by the fundamental principle of balancing approximation and sampling errors. We use this principle to balance learning errors and domain distance in a target error bound. As a result, we obtain a theoretically justified rule for the choice of the regularization parameter. In contrast to the state of the art, our approach allows source and target distributions with disjoint supports. An empirical comparative study on benchmark datasets underpins the performance of our approach.
Werner Zellinger, Natalia Shepeleva, Marius-Constantin Dinu, Hamid Eghbalzadeh, Hoan Duc Nguyen, Bernhard Nessler, Sergei V. Pereverzyev, Bernhard Moser 0001
NeurIPS3