Steganographic algorithms in low-bit-rate compressed speech bring convenience to realize covert communication, meanwhile result in safety issues. The existing steganalysis methods are normally designed for one specific category of steganographic methods, thus lacking generalization capability. In this paper, we propose a general steganalysis method based on code element (CE) embedding, Bi-LSTM and CNN with attention mechanisms. Firstly, CEs in each frame are converted to a multi-hot vector. And each multi-hot vector will be mapped into a fixed-length embedding vector to get a more compact representation by utilizing dictionaries. Then, Bi-LSTM and CNN are applied to extract the contextual information and the local characteristics respectively of these embedding vectors. In addition, the attention mechanisms are introduced in different layers of the network to assign different weights to the output feature within each layer. Finally, the prediction results can be generated by the fully connected layer. Experimental results show that our method performs better than the existing steganalysis methods for detecting multiple steganography methods in the low-bit-rate compressed speech streams.

Recent progress in vision-based fire detection is driven by convolutional neural networks. However, the existing methods fail to achieve a good tradeoff among accuracy, model size, and speed. In this paper, we propose an accurate fire detection method that achieves a better balance in the abovementioned aspects. Specifically, a multiscale feature extraction mechanism is employed to capture richer spatial details, which can enhance the discriminative ability of fire-like objects. Then, the implicit deep supervision mechanism is utilized to enhance the interaction among information flows through dense skip connections. Finally, a channel attention mechanism is employed to selectively emphasize the contribution between different feature maps. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves 95.3% accuracy, which outperforms the suboptimal method by 2.5%. Moreover, the speed and model size of our method are 3.76% faster on the GPU and 63.64% smaller than the suboptimal method, respectively.