Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Christian Saaler
dblp:275/5181
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 77% Recommender systems · 23% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › query understanding
query clustering |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | On the Usefulness of SQL-Query-Similarity Measures to Find User Interests · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2020 |
Information retrieval
query log analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | On the Usefulness of SQL-Query-Similarity Measures to Find User Interests · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2020 |
Information retrieval › query understanding › query analysis
query similarity |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | On the Usefulness of SQL-Query-Similarity Measures to Find User Interests · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2020 |
Recommender systems › user interest modeling
user interest mining |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | On the Usefulness of SQL-Query-Similarity Measures to Find User Interests · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2020 |
Information retrieval
query logs |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | On the Usefulness of SQL-Query-Similarity Measures to Find User Interests · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
similarity measure · 0.4clustering · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | On the Usefulness of SQL-Query-Similarity Measures to Find User InterestsabstractIn the sciences and elsewhere, the use of relational databases has become ubiquitous. An important challenge is finding hot spots of user interests. In principle, one can discover user interests by clustering the queries in the query log. Such a clustering requires a notion of query similarity. This, in turn, raises the question of what features of SQL queries are meaningful. We have studied the query representations proposed in the literature and corresponding similarity functions and have identified shortcomings of all of them. To overcome these limitations, we propose new similarity functions for SQL queries. They rely on the so-called access area of a query and, more specifically, on the overlap and the closeness of the access areas. We have carried out experiments systematically to compare the various similarity functions described in this article. The first series of experiments measures the quality of clustering and compares it to a ground truth. In the second series, we focus on the query log from the well-known SkyServer database. Here, a domain expert has interpreted various clusters by hand. We conclude that clusters obtained with our new measures of similarity seem to be good indicators of user interests. Natalia Arzamasova, Klemens Böhm, Bertrand Goldman, Christian Saaler, Martin Schäler |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 4 |