Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Patrick Henriksen

dblp:276/0548 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Program verification · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program verification
neural network verification
1.422025
Dynamic Back-Substitution in Bound-Propagation-Based Neural Network Verification · AAAI 2025
DEEPSPLIT: An Efficient Splitting Method for Neural Network Verification via Indirect Effect Analysis · IJCAI 2021
Program verification › neural network verification
bound propagation
0.912025
Dynamic Back-Substitution in Bound-Propagation-Based Neural Network Verification · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
certified robustness
0.712023
Robust Training of Neural Networks against Bias Field Perturbations · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
robust learning
0.712023
Robust Training of Neural Networks against Bias Field Perturbations · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.712023
Robust Training of Neural Networks against Bias Field Perturbations · AAAI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

split-node selection · 1.0linear programming · 1.0indirect effect analysis · 1.0bound propagation · 0.9back-substitution · 0.9symbolic interval propagation · 0.7interval bound propagation · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Dynamic Back-Substitution in Bound-Propagation-Based Neural Network Verification
abstract
We improve the efficacy of bound-propagation-based neural network verification by reducing the computational effort required by state-of-the-art propagation methods without incurring any loss in precision. We propose a method that infers the stability of ReLU nodes at every step of the back-substitution process, thereby dynamically simplifying the coefficient matrix of the symbolic bounding equations. We develop a heuristic for the effective application of the method and discuss its evaluation on common benchmarks where we show significant improvements in bound propagation times.
Panagiotis Kouvaros, Benedikt Brückner, Patrick Henriksen, Alessio Lomuscio
AAAI3
2023 Robust Training of Neural Networks against Bias Field Perturbations
abstract
We introduce the problem of training neural networks such that they are robust against a class of smooth intensity perturbations modelled by bias fields. We first develop an approach towards this goal based on a state-of-the-art robust training method utilising Interval Bound Propagation (IBP). We analyse the resulting algorithm and observe that IBP often produces very loose bounds for bias field perturbations, which may be detrimental to training. We then propose an alternative approach based on Symbolic Interval Propagation (SIP), which usually results in significantly tighter bounds than IBP. We present ROBNET, a tool implementing these approaches for bias field robust training. In experiments networks trained with the SIP-based approach achieved up to 31% higher certified robustness while also maintaining a better accuracy than networks trained with the IBP approach.
Patrick Henriksen, Alessio Lomuscio
AAAI1
2023 Verification-friendly Networks: the Case for Parametric ReLUs
abstract
It has increasingly been recognised that verification can contribute to the validation and debugging of neural networks before deployment, particularly in safety-critical areas. While progress has been made in the area of verification of neural networks, present techniques still do not scale to large ReLU-based neural networks used in many applications. In this paper we show that considerable progress can be made by employing Parametric ReLU activation functions in lieu of plain ReLU functions. We give training procedures that produce networks which achieve one order of magnitude gain in verification overheads and 30-100% fewer timeouts with VeriNet, a SoA Symbolic Interval Propagation-based verification toolkit, while not compromising the resulting accuracy. Furthermore, we show that adversarial training combined with our approach improves certified robustness up to 36% compared to adversarial training performed on baseline ReLU networks.
Francesco Leofante, Patrick Henriksen, Alessio Lomuscio
IJCNN2
2021 Bias Field Robustness Verification of Large Neural Image Classifiers
Patrick Henriksen, Kerstin Hammernik, Daniel Rueckert, Alessio Lomuscio
BMVC1
2021 DEEPSPLIT: An Efficient Splitting Method for Neural Network Verification via Indirect Effect Analysis
abstract
We propose a novel, complete algorithm for the verification and analysis of feed-forward, ReLU-based neural networks. The algorithm, based on symbolic interval propagation, introduces a new method for determining split-nodes which evaluates the indirect effect that splitting has on the relaxations of successor nodes. We combine this with a new efficient linear-programming encoding of the splitting constraints to further improve the algorithm’s performance. The resulting implementation, DeepSplit, achieved speedups of 1–2 orders of magnitude and 21-34% fewer timeouts when compared to the current SoA toolkits.
Patrick Henriksen, Alessio Lomuscio
IJCAI1
2020 Efficient Neural Network Verification via Adaptive Refinement and Adversarial Search
Patrick Henriksen, Alessio Lomuscio
ECAI1