Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zach Dinardo
dblp:276/0553
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Distance measures for tumor evolutionary trees · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
tumor evolution |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Distance measures for tumor evolutionary trees · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics
phylogenetic tree comparison |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Distance measures for tumor evolutionary trees · Bioinform. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tree distance measure · 0.4distinctly inherited set comparison · 0.4common ancestor set · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Distance measures for tumor evolutionary treesabstractMOTIVATION: There has been recent increased interest in using algorithmic methods to infer the evolutionary tree underlying the developmental history of a tumor. Quantitative measures that compare such trees are vital to a number of different applications including benchmarking tree inference methods and evaluating common inheritance patterns across patients. However, few appropriate distance measures exist, and those that do have low resolution for differentiating trees or do not fully account for the complex relationship between tree topology and the inheritance of the mutations labeling that topology. RESULTS: Here, we present two novel distance measures, Common Ancestor Set distance (CASet) and Distinctly Inherited Set Comparison distance (DISC), that are specifically designed to account for the subclonal mutation inheritance patterns characteristic of tumor evolutionary trees. We apply CASet and DISC to multiple simulated datasets and two breast cancer datasets and show that our distance measures allow for more nuanced and accurate delineation between tumor evolutionary trees than existing distance measures. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Implementations of CASet and DISC are freely available at: https://bitbucket.org/oesperlab/stereodist. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Zach Dinardo, Kiran Tomlinson, Anna M. Ritz, Layla Oesper |
Bioinform. | 1 |