Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Geraldine Horny
dblp:276/1005
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design › antibody design
complementarity-determining region design |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Antibody complementarity determining region design using high-capacity machine learning · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein design |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Antibody complementarity determining region design using high-capacity machine learning · Bioinform. 2020 |
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics
combinatorial design |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Ultra High Diversity Factorizable Libraries for Efficient Therapeutic Discovery · RECOMB 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
combinatorial library design · 1.1high-throughput sequencing · 0.4gradient-based machine learning · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Ultra High Diversity Factorizable Libraries for Efficient Therapeutic Discovery
Zheng Dai, Sachit D. Saksena, Geraldine Horny, Christine Banholzer, Stefan Ewert, David K. Gifford |
RECOMB | 3 |
| 2020 | Antibody complementarity determining region design using high-capacity machine learningabstractMOTIVATION: The precise targeting of antibodies and other protein therapeutics is required for their proper function and the elimination of deleterious off-target effects. Often the molecular structure of a therapeutic target is unknown and randomized methods are used to design antibodies without a model that relates antibody sequence to desired properties. RESULTS: Here, we present Ens-Grad, a machine learning method that can design complementarity determining regions of human Immunoglobulin G antibodies with target affinities that are superior to candidates derived from phage display panning experiments. We also demonstrate that machine learning can improve target specificity by the modular composition of models from different experimental campaigns, enabling a new integrative approach to improving target specificity. Our results suggest a new path for the discovery of therapeutic molecules by demonstrating that predictive and differentiable models of antibody binding can be learned from high-throughput experimental data without the need for target structural data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Sequencing data of the phage panning experiment are deposited at NIH's Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under the accession number SRP158510. We make our code available at https://github.com/gifford-lab/antibody-2019. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Jonas Mueller 0001, Brandon Carter 0001, Jonas Schilz, Geraldine Horny, Michael E. Birnbaum, Stefan Ewert, David K. Gifford |
Bioinform. | 7 |