Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dominik Roos
dblp:276/1054
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 2 · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
2 papers |
Routing and switching · 70% Internet architecture and protocols · 30% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Routing and switching
inter-domain routing |
1.0 | 2 | 2021 | Deployment and scalability of an inter-domain multi-path routing infrastructure · CoNEXT 2021 Colibri: a cooperative lightweight inter-domain bandwidth-reservation infrastructure · CoNEXT 2021 |
Internet architecture and protocols › resource reservation
bandwidth reservation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Colibri: a cooperative lightweight inter-domain bandwidth-reservation infrastructure · CoNEXT 2021 |
Routing and switching
multipath routing |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Deployment and scalability of an inter-domain multi-path routing infrastructure · CoNEXT 2021 |
Internet architecture and protocols › future internet architecture
path-aware networking |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Deployment and scalability of an inter-domain multi-path routing infrastructure · CoNEXT 2021 |
Distributed systems › distributed control
distributed control plane |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Colibri: a cooperative lightweight inter-domain bandwidth-reservation infrastructure · CoNEXT 2021 |
Distributed systems
distributed coordination |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Colibri: a cooperative lightweight inter-domain bandwidth-reservation infrastructure · CoNEXT 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stateless packet forwarding · 1.0distributed server infrastructure · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Colibri: a cooperative lightweight inter-domain bandwidth-reservation infrastructureabstractGuarantees for traffic traversing the public Internet are hard to come by, as service-level agreements are typically only available for traffic within a single autonomous system or towards direct neighbors. This deficiency leads to unpredictable performance already under normal conditions and can cause outages in the face of networklevel distributed-denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks. In this paper, we present an architecture achieving guaranteed bandwidth properties for global inter-domain network traffic. The control plane of our architecture is based on a distributed server infrastructure, while the data plane enables efficient packet forwarding on per-flow stateless routers. Our implementation demonstrates the technical feasibility and scalability of the design. Giacomo Giuliari, Dominik Roos, Marc Wyss, Juan A. García-Pardo, Markus Legner, Adrian Perrig |
CoNEXT | 2 |
| 2021 | Deployment and scalability of an inter-domain multi-path routing infrastructureabstractPath aware networking (PAN) is a promising approach that enables endpoints to participate in end-to-end path selection. PAN unlocks numerous benefits, such as fast failover after link failures, application-based path selection and optimization, and native interdomain multi-path. The utility of PAN hinges on the availability of a large number of high-quality path options. In an inter-domain context, two core questions arise. Can we deploy such an architecture natively in today's Internet infrastructure without creating an overlay relying on BGP? Can we build a scalable multi-path routing system that provides a large number of high-quality paths? Cyrill Krähenbühl, Seyedali Tabaeiaghdaei, Christelle Gloor, Jonghoon Kwon, Adrian Perrig, David Hausheer, Dominik Roos |
CoNEXT | 7 |
| 2020 | PISKES: Pragmatic Internet-Scale Key-Establishment SystemabstractDenial-of-service attacks have become increasingly prevalent in the Internet. In many cases they are enabled or facilitated by the lack of source authentication?it is often easy for an attacker to spoof its own IP address and thus launch reflection attacks or evade detection. There have been attempts in the past to resolve this issue through filtering or cryptography-based techniques; however, there is still no sufficiently strong system in place today-all proposals either provide weak security guarantees, are not efficient enough, or lack incentives for deployment. In this paper we present PISKES, a pragmatic Internet-scale key-establishment system enabling firstpacket authentication. Through the PISKES infrastructure, any host can locally obtain a symmetric key to enable a remote service to perform source-address authentication. The remote service can itself locally derive the same key with efficient cryptographic operations. PISKES thus enables packet authentication for a wide variety of systems including high-throughput applications like DNS. We have implemented a prototype system that enables a DNS server to verify the source of every received packet within 85 ns, which is over 220 times faster than a system based on asymmetric cryptography. PISKES has been developed for the SCION secure Internet architecture but is also applicable to today's Internet. With its strong source-authentication properties and highly efficient operation it has the potential to finally bring network-layer authentication to the Internet Benjamin Rothenberger, Dominik Roos, Markus Legner, Adrian Perrig |
AsiaCCS | 2 |