Genome annotation is essential for understanding the functional elements within genomes. While automated methods are indispensable for processing large-scale genomic data, they often face challenges in accurately predicting gene structures and functions. Consequently, manual curation by domain experts remains crucial for validating and refining these predictions. These combined outcomes from automated tools and manual curation highlight the importance of integrating human expertise with artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities to improve both the accuracy and efficiency of genome annotation. However, the manual curation process is inherently labor-intensive and time-consuming, making it difficult to scale for large datasets. To address these challenges, we propose a conceptual framework, Human-AI Collaborative Genome Annotation (HAICoGA), that leverages the synergistic partnership between humans and AI to enhance human capabilities and accelerate the genome annotation process. Additionally, we explore the potential of integrating large language models into this framework to support and augment specific tasks. Finally, we discuss emerging challenges and outline open research questions to guide further exploration in this area.

MOTIVATION: Genetic map construction is a foundational step in the analysis of structured experimental populations. For markers that hybridize to several genetically similar locations, or where several alleles are present (such as in multiparental populations), current methods often discard the marker or incorrectly call the genotypes. These errors result in information loss, or incorrect genotypes that can corrupt map construction. RESULTS: We present a new approach for simultaneously performing genetic map construction and marker calling. Our new approach allows the calling of a larger number of markers, a larger number of unique alleles per marker and the correct use of markers which hybridize to multiple genetically similar locations. We demonstrate our new approach using simulations, a biparental wheat population and an eight-parent population of spring bread wheat. Applying our method to the eight-parent population increased the number of mapped markers by 71%. We show that the new genetic map allows the investigation of synteny in ways that were not previously possible in that dataset. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The method described in this article has been incorporated into R package mpMap2. It is available from CRAN and also from https://github.com/rohan-shah/mpMap2. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.