Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marykate Murphy

dblp:276/1273 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Medical and health informatics › clinical diagnosis
disease classification
0.412020
Polar labeling: silver standard algorithm for training disease classifiers · Bioinform. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

polar labeling · 0.4machine learning · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Polar labeling: silver standard algorithm for training disease classifiers
abstract
MOTIVATION: Expert-labeled data are essential to train phenotyping algorithms for cohort identification. However expert labeling is time and labor intensive, and the costs remain prohibitive for scaling phenotyping to wider use-cases. RESULTS: We present an approach referred to as polar labeling (PL), to create silver standard for training machine learning (ML) for disease classification. We test the hypothesis that ML models trained on the silver standard created by applying PL on unlabeled patient records, are comparable in performance to the ML models trained on gold standard, created by clinical experts through manual review of patient records. We perform experimental validation using health records of 38 023 patients spanning six diseases. Our results demonstrate the superior performance of the proposed approach. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: We provide a Python implementation of the algorithm and the Python code developed for this study on Github. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Kavishwar B. Wagholikar, Hossein Estiri, Marykate Murphy, Shawn N. Murphy
Bioinform.3