EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kyuwook Chai
dblp:276/1360
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
combinatorial bandits |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Combinatorial Neural Bandits · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
contextual bandit |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Combinatorial Neural Bandits · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
exploration-exploitation tradeoff |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Combinatorial Neural Bandits · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit › parametric bandits
neural bandit |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Combinatorial Neural Bandits · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
thompson sampling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Combinatorial Neural Bandits · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
upper confidence bound · 0.7thompson sampling · 0.7neural tangent kernel · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Combinatorial Neural BanditsabstractWe consider a contextual combinatorial bandit problem where in each round a learning agent selects a subset of arms and receives feedback on the selected arms according to their scores. The score of an arm is an unknown function of the arm’s feature. Approximating this unknown score function with deep neural networks, we propose algorithms: Combinatorial Neural UCB ($\texttt{CN-UCB}$) and Combinatorial Neural Thompson Sampling ($\texttt{CN-TS}$). We prove that $\texttt{CN-UCB}$ achieves $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\tilde{d} \sqrt{T})$ or $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{\tilde{d} T K})$ regret, where $\tilde{d}$ is the effective dimension of a neural tangent kernel matrix, $K$ is the size of a subset of arms, and $T$ is the time horizon. For $\texttt{CN-TS}$, we adapt an optimistic sampling technique to ensure the optimism of the sampled combinatorial action, achieving a worst-case (frequentist) regret of $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\tilde{d} \sqrt{TK})$. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first combinatorial neural bandit algorithms with regret performance guarantees. In particular, $\texttt{CN-TS}$ is the first Thompson sampling algorithm with the worst-case regret guarantees for the general contextual combinatorial bandit problem. The numerical experiments demonstrate the superior performances of our proposed algorithms. Taehyun Hwang, Kyuwook Chai, Min-hwan Oh |
ICML | 2 |