Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shourya Pandey
dblp:276/4707
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Learning theory · 33% Representation and self-supervised learning · 33% Efficient and distributed learning · 22% | |
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 87% Mathematical optimization · 13% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
1.8 | 2 | 2026 | On the Curse of Dimensionality in Private Sparse Covariance Estimation and PCA · COLT 2026 On Differentially Private U Statistics · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
high-dimensional statistics |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | On the Curse of Dimensionality in Private Sparse Covariance Estimation and PCA · COLT 2026 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › principal component analysis
sparse principal component analysis |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | On the Curse of Dimensionality in Private Sparse Covariance Estimation and PCA · COLT 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › information-theoretic analysis
information-theoretic bounds |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Low Precision Streaming PCA · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › quantization
low-precision computation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Low Precision Streaming PCA · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
principal component analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Low Precision Streaming PCA · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
quantization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Low Precision Streaming PCA · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › online optimization
streaming PCA |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Low Precision Streaming PCA · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › component analysis
robust principal component analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Black-Box k-to-1-PCA Reductions: Theory and Applications · COLT 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Black-Box k-to-1-PCA Reductions: Theory and Applications · COLT 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
private statistical estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On Differentially Private U Statistics · NeurIPS 2024 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
dimensionality reduction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Black-Box k-to-1-PCA Reductions: Theory and Applications · COLT 2024 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › dimensionality reduction
principal component analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Black-Box k-to-1-PCA Reductions: Theory and Applications · COLT 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › numerical analysis
eigenvalue problem |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Black-Box k-to-1-PCA Reductions: Theory and Applications · COLT 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
operator norm · 2.0deflation methods · 1.5black-box reduction · 1.5lower bounds · 1.0lower bound · 1.0stochastic quantization · 0.9oja's algorithm · 0.9thresholding · 0.8hájek projection · 0.8differential privacy · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | On the Curse of Dimensionality in Private Sparse Covariance Estimation and PCAabstractWe study high-dimensional differentially private (DP) covariance estimation in the operator norm, and principal component analysis (PCA), under $k$-row-column sparsity ($k$-RCS) of the covariance matrix. In the non-private setting, it is known that $\operatorname{poly}(k,\log d)$ samples suffice to solve both of these problems. However, the only comparable result known under DP (Wang and Xu, 2021) requires $\Omega(d)$ samples under standard parameterizations of the problem. We investigate when this curse of dimensionality is inherent for sparse covariance estimation tasks under DP. On the upper bound front, we show that a $\operatorname{poly}(k,\log d)$ sample complexity for PCA is possible under DP, if we also posit sparsity of the leading eigenvector. We complement this result with $\operatorname{poly}(d)$ lower bounds under DP for both sparse covariance estimation and PCA, establishing an exponential gap between the private and non-private variants of these problems when $k=\operatorname{polylog}(d)$. To our knowledge, no such separation has previously been demonstrated for any sparse estimation problem in private high-dimensional statistics. Our techniques are flexible enough that they imply stronger lower bounds even for the well-studied problem of standard DP PCA, without sparsity assumptions. Syamantak Kumar, Shourya Pandey, Purnamrita Sarkar, Kevin Tian |
COLT | 2 |
| 2025 | Low Precision Streaming PCAabstractLow-precision Streaming PCA estimates the top principal component in a streaming setting under limited precision. We establish an information‐theoretic lower bound on the quantization resolution required to achieve a target accuracy for the leading eigenvector. We study Oja's algorithm for streaming PCA under linear and nonlinear stochastic quantization. The quantized variants use unbiased stochastic quantization of the weight vector and the updates. Under mild moment and spectral-gap assumptions on the data distribution, we show that a batched version achieves the lower bound up to logarithmic factors under both schemes. This leads to a nearly _dimension-free_ quantization error in the nonlinear quantization setting. Empirical evaluations on synthetic streams validate our theoretical findings and demonstrate that our low-precision methods closely track the performance of standard Oja’s algorithm. Sanjoy Dasgupta, Syamantak Kumar, Shourya Pandey, Purnamrita Sarkar |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2025 | Beyond Sin-Squared Error: Linear Time Entrywise Uncertainty Quantification for Streaming PCAabstractWe propose a novel statistical inference framework for streaming principal component analysis (PCA) using Oja’s algorithm, enabling the construction of confidence intervals for individual entries of the estimated eigenvector. Most existing works on streaming PCA focus on providing sharp sin-squared error guarantees. Recently, there has been some interest in uncertainty quantification for the sin-squared error. However, uncertainty quantification or sharp error guarantees for _entries of the estimated eigenvector_ in the streaming setting remains largely unexplored. We derive a sharp Bernstein-type concentration bound for elements of the estimated vector matching the optimal error rate up to logarithmic factors. We also establish a Central Limit Theorem for a suitably centered and scaled subset of the entries. To efficiently estimate the coordinate-wise variance, we introduce a provably consistent subsampling algorithm that leverages the median-of-means approach, empirically achieving similar accuracy to multiplier bootstrap methods while being significantly more computationally efficient. Numerical experiments demonstrate its effectiveness in providing reliable uncertainty estimates with a fraction of the computational cost of existing methods. Syamantak Kumar, Shourya Pandey, Purnamrita Sarkar |
UAI | 2 |
| 2024 | Black-Box k-to-1-PCA Reductions: Theory and ApplicationsabstractThe $k$-principal component analysis ($k$-PCA) problem is a fundamental algorithmic primitive that is widely-used in data analysis and dimensionality reduction applications. In statistical settings, the goal of $k$-PCA is to identify a top eigenspace of the covariance matrix of a distribution, which we only have black-box access to via samples. Motivated by these settings, we analyze black-box deflation methods as a framework for designing $k$-PCA algorithms, where we model access to the unknown target matrix via a black-box $1$-PCA oracle which returns an approximate top eigenvector, under two popular notions of approximation. Despite being arguably the most natural reduction-based approach to $k$-PCA algorithm design, such black-box methods, which recursively call a $1$-PCA oracle $k$ times, were previously poorly-understood. Our main contribution is significantly sharper bounds on the approximation parameter degradation of deflation methods for $k$-PCA. For a quadratic form notion of approximation we term ePCA (energy PCA), we show deflation methods suffer no parameter loss. For an alternative well-studied approximation notion we term cPCA (correlation PCA), we tightly characterize the parameter regimes where deflation methods are feasible. Moreover, we show that in all feasible regimes, $k$-cPCA deflation algorithms suffer no asymptotic parameter loss for any constant $k$. We apply our framework to obtain state-of-the-art $k$-PCA algorithms robust to dataset contamination, improving prior work in sample complexity by a $\mathsf{poly}(k)$ factor. Arun Jambulapati, Syamantak Kumar, Jerry Li 0001, Shourya Pandey, Ankit Pensia, Kevin Tian |
COLT | 4 |
| 2024 | On Differentially Private U StatisticsabstractWe consider the problem of privately estimating a parameter $\mathbb{E}[h(X_1,\dots,X_k)]$, where $X_1$, $X_2$, $\dots$, $X_k$ are i.i.d. data from some distribution and $h$ is a permutation-invariant function. Without privacy constraints, the standard estimators for this task are U-statistics, which commonly arise in a wide range of problems, including nonparametric signed rank tests, symmetry testing, uniformity testing, and subgraph counts in random networks, and are the unique minimum variance unbiased estimators under mild conditions. Despite the recent outpouring of interest in private mean estimation, privatizing U-statistics has received little attention. While existing private mean estimation algorithms can be applied in a black-box manner to obtain confidence intervals, we show that they can lead to suboptimal private error, e.g., constant-factor inflation in the leading term, or even $\Theta(1/n)$ rather than $O(1/n^2)$ in degenerate settings. To remedy this, we propose a new thresholding-based approach that reweights different subsets of the data using _local Hájek projections_. This leads to nearly optimal private error for non-degenerate U-statistics and a strong indication of near-optimality for degenerate U-statistics. Kamalika Chaudhuri, Po-Ling Loh, Shourya Pandey, Purnamrita Sarkar |
NeurIPS | 3 |