Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chengwu Liu 0001

dblp:276/4722-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-7383-0951ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Automated reasoning and model checking · 78% Algorithms and data structures · 22%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 68% Trustworthy machine learning · 32%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data stream processing · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents
1.012026
Discover and Prove: An Open-source Agentic Framework for Hard Mode Automated Theorem Proving in Lean 4 · ACL (1) 2026
Automated reasoning and model checking
automated theorem proving
1.012026
Discover and Prove: An Open-source Agentic Framework for Hard Mode Automated Theorem Proving in Lean 4 · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning
0.912025
Safe: Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models via Retrospective Step-aware Formal Verification · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › verification
formal verification
0.912025
Safe: Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models via Retrospective Step-aware Formal Verification · ACL (1) 2025
Automated reasoning and model checking › theorem proving
formal proof
0.912025
Safe: Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models via Retrospective Step-aware Formal Verification · ACL (1) 2025
Automated reasoning and model checking
theorem proving
0.912025
Safe: Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models via Retrospective Step-aware Formal Verification · ACL (1) 2025
Algorithms and data structures
sketching
0.812024
WavingSketch: an unbiased and generic sketch for finding top-k items in data streams · VLDB J. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lean 4 · 2.0agentic framework · 2.0self-consistency · 1.7process reward model · 1.7chain-of-thought prompting · 1.7sketching · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Discover and Prove: An Open-source Agentic Framework for Hard Mode Automated Theorem Proving in Lean 4
abstract
Chengwu Liu, Yichun Yin, Ye Yuan, Jiaxuan Xie, Botao Li, Siqi Li, Jianhao Shen, Yan Xu, Lifeng Shang, Ming Zhang. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Chengwu Liu 0001, Yichun Yin, Ye Yuan 0016, Jiaxuan Xie, Botao Li, Jianhao Shen, Lifeng Shang, Ming Zhang 0004
ACL (1)1
2025 Safe: Enhancing Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models via Retrospective Step-aware Formal Verification
abstract
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has become the de facto method to elicit reasoning capabilities from large language models (LLMs). However, to mitigate hallucinations in CoT that are notoriously difficult to detect, current methods such as process reward models (PRMs) or self-consistency operate as opaque boxes and do not provide checkable evidence for their judgments, possibly limiting their effectiveness. To address this issue, we draw inspiration from the idea that “the gold standard for supporting a mathematical claim is to provide a proof”. We propose a retrospective, step-aware formal verification framework Safe. Rather than assigning arbitrary scores, we strive to articulate mathematical claims in formal mathematical language Lean 4 at each reasoning step and provide formal proofs to identify hallucinations. We evaluate our framework Safe across multiple language models and various mathematical datasets, demonstrating a significant performance improvement while offering interpretable and verifiable evidence. We also propose FormalStep as a benchmark for step correctness theorem proving with 30,809 formal statements. To the best of our knowledge, our work represents the first endeavor to utilize formal mathematical language Lean 4 for verifying content generated by LLMs, aligning with the reason why formal mathematical languages were created in the first place: to provide a robust foundation for hallucination-prone human-written proofs.
Chengwu Liu 0001, Ye Yuan 0016, Yichun Yin, Zaoyu Chen, Yasheng Wang, Lifeng Shang, Qun Liu 0001, Ming Zhang 0004
ACL (1)1
2025 MHGC: Multi-scale hard sample mining for contrastive deep graph clustering
Tao Ren 0002, Yifan Wang 0014, Wei Ju 0001, Chengwu Liu 0001, Fanchun Meng, Siyu Yi, Xiao Luo 0001
Inf. Process. Manag.5
2024 WavingSketch: an unbiased and generic sketch for finding top-k items in data streams
Zirui Liu 0002, Fenghao Dong, Chengwu Liu 0001, Xiangwei Deng, Tong Yang 0003, Yikai Zhao 0001, Jizhou Li, Bin Cui 0001, Gong Zhang 0001
VLDB J.3