EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Teruo M. Maruyama
dblp:276/5537
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-5173-0375ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Face, body and person analysis · 77% Deep learning architectures and training · 23% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Biometric security · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
biometric recognition |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Intrapersonal Parameter Optimization for Offline Handwritten Signature Augmentation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2021 |
Biometric security
signature verification |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Intrapersonal Parameter Optimization for Offline Handwritten Signature Augmentation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Intrapersonal Parameter Optimization for Offline Handwritten Signature Augmentation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
writer variability modeling · 1.0feature space augmentation · 1.0SVM · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Intrapersonal Parameter Optimization for Offline Handwritten Signature AugmentationabstractUsually, in a real-world scenario, few signature samples are available to train an automatic signature verification system (ASVS). However, such systems do indeed need a lot of signatures to achieve an acceptable performance. Neuromotor signature duplication methods and feature space augmentation methods may be used to meet the need for an increase in the number of samples. Such techniques manually or empirically define a set of parameters to introduce a degree of writer variability. Therefore, in the present study, a method to automatically model the most common writer variability traits is proposed. The method is used to generate offline signatures in the image and the feature space and train an ASVS. We also introduce an alternative approach to evaluate the quality of samples considering their feature vectors. We evaluated the performance of an ASVS with the generated samples using three well-known offline signature datasets: GPDS, MCYT-75, and CEDAR. In GPDS-300, when the SVM classifier was trained using one genuine signature per writer and the duplicates generated in the image space, the Equal Error Rate (EER) decreased from 5.71% to 1.08%. Under the same conditions, the EER decreased to 1.04% using the feature space augmentation technique. We also verified that the model that generates duplicates in the image space reproduces the most common writer variability traits in the three different datasets. Teruo M. Maruyama, Luiz Eduardo Soares de Oliveira, Alceu S. Britto Jr., Robert Sabourin |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. | 1 |