Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Siting Li

dblp:276/6504 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-8292-1393ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Vision and language · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
contrastive vision-language model
0.912025
Exploring How Generative MLLMs Perceive More Than CLIP with the Same Vision Encoder · ACL (1) 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
0.912025
Exploring How Generative MLLMs Perceive More Than CLIP with the Same Vision Encoder · ACL (1) 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual reasoning
0.912025
Exploring How Generative MLLMs Perceive More Than CLIP with the Same Vision Encoder · ACL (1) 2025
Information retrieval › search engines › semantic search › entity retrieval
attribute-based retrieval
0.912025
Highlighting What Matters: Promptable Embeddings for Attribute-Focused Image Retrieval · NeurIPS 2025
Information retrieval › cross-modal retrieval
text-to-image retrieval
0.912025
Highlighting What Matters: Promptable Embeddings for Attribute-Focused Image Retrieval · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model
0.312025
Highlighting What Matters: Promptable Embeddings for Attribute-Focused Image Retrieval · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

promptable embeddings · 1.7linear approximation · 1.7controlled experiment · 0.9contrastive learning · 0.9autoregressive training · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Exploiting Label-Independent Regularization from Spatial Patterns for Whole Slide Image Analysis
abstract
Whole slide images, with their gigapixel-scale panoramas of tissue samples, are pivotal for precise disease diagnosis. However, their analysis is hindered by immense data size and scarce annotations. Existing MIL methods face challenges due to the fundamental imbalance where a single bag-level label must guide the learning of numerous patch-level features. This sparse supervision makes it difficult to reliably identify discriminative patches during training, leading to unstable optimization and suboptimal solutions. We propose a spatially regularized MIL framework that leverages inherent spatial relationships among patch features as label-independent regularization signals. Our approach learns a shared representation space by jointly optimizing feature-induced spatial reconstruction and label-guided classification objectives, enforcing consistency between intrinsic structural patterns and supervisory signals. Experimental results on multiple public datasets demonstrate significant improvements over state-of-the-art methods, offering a promising direction. The code is available at https://github.com/wwyi1828/SRMIL.
Weiyi Wu, Xinwen Xu, Chongyang Gao, Xingjian Diao, Siting Li, Jiang Gui
WACV5
2025 Exploring How Generative MLLMs Perceive More Than CLIP with the Same Vision Encoder
abstract
Recent research has shown that CLIP models struggle with visual reasoning tasks that require grounding compositionality, understanding spatial relationships, or capturing fine-grained details. One natural hypothesis is that the CLIP vision encoder does not embed essential information for these tasks. However, we find that this is not always the case: The encoder gathers query-relevant visual information, while CLIP fails to extract it. In particular, we show that another branch of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), Generative Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), achieve significantly higher accuracy than CLIP in many of these tasks using the same vision encoder and weights, indicating that these Generative MLLMs perceive more—as they extract and utilize visual information more effectively. We conduct a series of controlled experiments and reveal that their success is attributed to multiple key design choices, including patch tokens, position embeddings, and prompt-based weighting. On the other hand, enhancing the training data alone or applying a stronger text encoder does not suffice to solve the task, and additional text tokens offer little benefit. Interestingly, we find that fine-grained visual reasoning is not exclusive to generative models trained by an autoregressive loss: When converted into CLIP-like encoders by contrastive finetuning, these MLLMs still outperform CLIP under the same cosine similarity-based evaluation protocol. Our study highlights the importance of VLM architectural choices and suggests directions for improving the performance of CLIP-like contrastive VLMs.
Siting Li, Pang Wei Koh, Simon S. Du
ACL (1)1
2025 Highlighting What Matters: Promptable Embeddings for Attribute-Focused Image Retrieval
abstract
While an image is worth more than a thousand words, only a few provide crucial information for a given task and thus should be focused on. In light of this, ideal text-to-image (T2I) retrievers should prioritize specific visual attributes relevant to queries. To evaluate current retrievers on handling attribute-focused queries, we build COCO-Facet, a COCO-based benchmark with 9,112 queries about diverse attributes of interest. We find that CLIP-like retrievers, which are widely adopted due to their efficiency and zero-shot ability, have poor and imbalanced performance, possibly because their image embeddings focus on global semantics and subjects while leaving out other details. Notably, we reveal that even recent Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM)-based, stronger retrievers with a larger output dimension struggle with this limitation. Hence, we hypothesize that retrieving with *general* image embeddings is suboptimal for performing such queries. As a solution, we propose to use *promptable* image embeddings enabled by these multimodal retrievers, which boost performance by highlighting required attributes. Our pipeline for deriving such embeddings generalizes across query types, image pools, and base retriever architectures. To enhance real-world applicability, we offer two acceleration strategies: Pre-processing promptable embeddings and using linear approximations. We show that the former yields a 15\% improvement in Recall@5 when prompts are predefined, while the latter achieves an 8\% improvement when prompts are only available during inference.
Siting Li, Simon S. Du
NeurIPS1
2022 An unbiased kinship estimation method for genetic data analysis
abstract
Accurate estimate of relatedness is important for genetic data analyses, such as heritability estimation and association mapping based on data collected from genome-wide association studies. Inaccurate relatedness estimates may lead to biased heritability estimations and spurious associations. Individual-level genotype data are often used to estimate kinship coefficient between individuals. The commonly used sample correlation-based genomic relationship matrix (scGRM) method estimates kinship coefficient by calculating the average sample correlation coefficient among all single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), where the observed allele frequencies are used to calculate both the expectations and variances of genotypes. Although this method is widely used, a substantial proportion of estimated kinship coefficients are negative, which are difficult to interpret. In this paper, through mathematical derivation, we show that there indeed exists bias in the estimated kinship coefficient using the scGRM method when the observed allele frequencies are regarded as true frequencies. This leads to negative bias for the average estimate of kinship among all individuals, which explains the estimated negative kinship coefficients. Based on this observation, we propose an unbiased estimation method, UKin, which can reduce kinship estimation bias. We justify our improved method with rigorous mathematical proof. We have conducted simulations as well as two real data analyses to compare UKin with scGRM and three other kinship estimating methods: rGRM, tsGRM, and KING. Our results demonstrate that both bias and root mean square error in kinship coefficient estimation could be reduced by using UKin. We further investigated the performance of UKin, KING, and three GRM-based methods in calculating the SNP-based heritability, and show that UKin can improve estimation accuracy for heritability regardless of the scale of SNP panel.
Wei Jiang 0019, Siting Li, Shuang Song 0006, Hongyu Zhao 0003
BMC Bioinform.3