Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shouzhuo Sun
dblp:276/6521
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Database theory · 47% Indexing and storage engines · 41% Database system architecture and tuning · 12% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Computational complexity · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Indexing and storage engines › caching
data caching |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Data Caching for Enterprise-Grade Petabyte-Scale OLAP · USENIX ATC 2024 |
Database theory
conjunctive query evaluation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Aggregated Deletion Propagation for Counting Conjunctive Query Answers · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020 |
Database theory › view update
deletion propagation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Aggregated Deletion Propagation for Counting Conjunctive Query Answers · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020 |
Computational complexity
query complexity |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Aggregated Deletion Propagation for Counting Conjunctive Query Answers · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
heuristic algorithm · 0.9complexity analysis · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Data Caching for Enterprise-Grade Petabyte-Scale OLAP
Chunxu Tang, Beinan Wang, Ziyue Qiu, Lu Qiu, Shouzhuo Sun, Saiguang Che, Jiaming Mai, Shouwei Chen, Jianjian Xie, Yutian Sun, Mingmin Chen |
USENIX ATC | 10 |
| 2020 | Aggregated Deletion Propagation for Counting Conjunctive Query AnswersabstractWe investigate the computational complexity of minimizing the source side-effect in order to remove a given number of tuples from the output of a conjunctive query. This is a variant of the well-studied deletion propagation problem, the difference being that we are interested in removing the smallest subset of input tuples to remove a given number of output tuples while deletion propagation focuses on removing a specific output tuple. We call this the Aggregated Deletion Propagation problem. We completely characterize the poly-time solvability of this problem for arbitrary conjunctive queries without self-joins. This includes a poly-time algorithm to decide solvability, as well as an exact structural characterization of NP-hard instances. We also provide a practical algorithm for this problem (a heuristic for NP-hard instances) and evaluate its experimental performance on real and synthetic datasets. Xiao Hu 0005, Shouzhuo Sun, Shweta Patwa, Debmalya Panigrahi, Sudeepa Roy 0001 |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 2 |