Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lars Prehn

dblp:277/0393 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0003-0942-9962ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
3 papers
Routing and switching · 67% Network optimization and economics · 13% Internet architecture and protocols · 13%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Routing and switching
inter-domain routing
0.922021
How biased is our validation (data) for AS relationships? · Internet Measurement Conference 2021
AS-Path Prepending: there is no rose without a thorn · Internet Measurement Conference 2020
Routing and switching › inter-domain routing
AS relationship inference
0.512021
How biased is our validation (data) for AS relationships? · Internet Measurement Conference 2021
Routing and switching › inter-domain routing › BGP
AS-path prepending
0.412020
AS-Path Prepending: there is no rose without a thorn · Internet Measurement Conference 2020
Routing and switching › inter-domain routing
BGP
0.412020
AS-Path Prepending: there is no rose without a thorn · Internet Measurement Conference 2020
Internet architecture and protocols › naming and addressing
IP addressing
0.412020
When wells run dry: the 2020 IPv4 address market · CoNEXT 2020
Network optimization and economics
network economics
0.412020
When wells run dry: the 2020 IPv4 address market · CoNEXT 2020
Network measurement and analytics › internet measurement
routing measurement
0.112020
AS-Path Prepending: there is no rose without a thorn · Internet Measurement Conference 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

empirical analysis · 0.5measurement study · 0.4RDAP data analysis · 0.4BGP data analysis · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Kirin: Hitting the Internet with Distributed BGP Announcements
abstract
The Internet is a critical resource in the daily life of billions of users. To support the growing number of users and their increasing demands, operators continuously scale their network footprint---e.g., by joining Internet Exchange Points (IXPs)---and adopt relevant technologies---such as IPv6---which provides a vastly larger address space than its predecessor.
Lars Prehn, Pawel Foremski, Oliver Gasser
AsiaCCS1
2022 Peering Only? Analyzing the Reachability Benefits of Joining Large IXPs Today
Lars Prehn, Franziska Lichtblau, Christoph Dietzel, Anja Feldmann
PAM1
2021 How biased is our validation (data) for AS relationships?
abstract
The business relationships between Autonomous Systems (ASes) can provide fundamental insights into the Internet's routing ecosystem. Throughout the last two decades, many works focused on how to improve the inference of those relationships. Yet, it has proven difficult to assemble extensive ground-truth data sets for validation. Therefore, more recent works rely entirely on relationships extracted from BGP communities to serve as "best-effort" ground-truth. In this paper, we highlight the shortcomings of this trend. We show that the best-effort validation data does not cover relationships between ASes within the Latin American (LACNIC) service region even though ~14% of all inferred relationships are from that region. We further show that the overall precision of 96-98 % for peering relationships achieved by three of the most prominent algorithms can drop by 14-25 % when considering only peering relationships between Tier-1 and other transit providers. Finally, we discuss potential ways to overcome the presented challenges in the future.
Lars Prehn, Anja Feldmann
Internet Measurement Conference1
2020 When wells run dry: the 2020 IPv4 address market
abstract
With the recent IPv4 address exhaustion, many networks can no longer rely on requesting additional IPv4 addresses space. They resort to new ways to obtain addresses: buying and leasing. In this paper, we first shed light on the recent economic trends of the IPv4 buying market by augmenting transfer statistics with public and private pricing information from four large IPv4 brokers. We infer the size of the IPv4 leasing market through two different data sources: routing information observed from BGP collectors and RDAP databases operated by the Regional Internet Registries. We find that neither of those sources alone is capable of estimating the full market size. We relate our findings to discussions with 13 IPv4 brokers and summarize how networks handle their demand for obtaining IPv4 addresses in 2020.
Lars Prehn, Franziska Lichtblau, Anja Feldmann
CoNEXT1
2020 AS-Path Prepending: there is no rose without a thorn
abstract
Inbound traffic engineering (ITE)---the process of announcing routes to, e.g., maximize revenue or minimize congestion---is an essential task for Autonomous Systems (ASes). AS Path Prepending (ASPP) is an easy to use and well-known ITE technique that routing manuals show as one of the first alternatives to influence other ASes' routing decisions. We observe that origin ASes currently prepend more than 25% of all IPv4 prefixes.
Pedro de B. Marcos, Lars Prehn, Lucas Leal, Alberto Dainotti, Anja Feldmann, Marinho P. Barcellos
Internet Measurement Conference2