Jan Derbisz

dblp:277/0898 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 4 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Recognizing H-Graphs - Beyond Circular-Arc Graphs
abstract
In 1992 Biró, Hujter and Tuza introduced, for every fixed connected graph $H$, the class of $H$-graphs, defined as the intersection graphs of connected subgraphs of some subdivision of $H$. Recently, quite a lot of research has been devoted to understanding the tractability border for various computational problems, such as recognition or isomorphism testing, in classes of $H$-graphs for different graphs $H$. In this work we undertake this research topic, focusing on the recognition problem. Chaplick, Töpfer, Voborn\'ık, and Zeman showed, for every fixed tree $T$, a polynomial-time algorithm recognizing $T$-graphs. Tucker showed a polynomial time algorithm recognizing $K_3$-graphs (circular-arc graphs). On the other hand, Chaplick at al. showed that recognition of $H$-graphs is $NP$-hard if $H$ contains two different cycles sharing an edge. The main two results of this work narrow the gap between the $NP$-hard and $P$ cases of $H$-graphs recognition. First, we show that recognition of $H$-graphs is $NP$-hard when $H$ contains two different cycles. On the other hand, we show a polynomial-time algorithm recognizing $L$-graphs, where $L$ is a graph containing a cycle and an edge attached to it ($L$-graphs are called lollipop graphs). Our work leaves open the recognition problems of $M$-graphs for every unicyclic graph $M$ different from a cycle and a lollipop. Other results of this work, which shed some light on the cases that remain open, are as follows. Firstly, the recognition of $M$-graphs, where $M$ is a fixed unicyclic graph, admits a polynomial time algorithm if we restrict the input to graphs containing particular holes (hence recognition of $M$-graphs is probably most difficult for chordal graphs). Secondly, the recognition of medusa graphs, which are defined as the union of $M$-graphs, where $M$ runs over all unicyclic graphs, is $NP$-complete.
Deniz Agaoglu, Onur Çagirici, Jan Derbisz, Tim A. Hartmann, Petr Hlinený, Jan Kratochvíl, Tomasz Krawczyk, Peter Zeman 0001
MFCS3
2022 Vertex Deletion into Bipartite Permutation Graphs
abstract
Abstract A permutation graph can be defined as an intersection graph of segments whose endpoints lie on two parallel lines $$\ell _1$$ ℓ 1 and $$\ell _2$$ ℓ 2 , one on each. A bipartite permutation graph is a permutation graph which is bipartite. In this paper we study the parameterized complexity of the bipartite permutation vertex deletion problem, which asks, for a given n-vertex graph, whether we can remove at most k vertices to obtain a bipartite permutation graph. This problem is $$\mathsf {NP}$$ NP -complete by the classical result of Lewis and Yannakakis [20]. We analyze the structure of the so-called almost bipartite permutation graphs which may contain holes (large induced cycles) in contrast to bipartite permutation graphs. We exploit the structural properties of the shortest hole in a such graph. We use it to obtain an algorithm for the bipartite permutation vertex deletion problem with running time $${\mathcal {O}}(9^k \cdot n^9)$$ O ( 9 k · n 9 ) , and also give a polynomial-time 9-approximation algorithm.
Lukasz Bozyk, Jan Derbisz, Tomasz Krawczyk, Jana Masaríková, Karolina Okrasa
Algorithmica2
2022 A Polynomial Kernel for Bipartite Permutation Vertex Deletion
Jan Derbisz, Lawqueen Kanesh, Jayakrishnan Madathil, Saket Saurabh 0001, Shaily Verma
Algorithmica1
2020 Vertex Deletion into Bipartite Permutation Graphs
Lukasz Bozyk, Jan Derbisz, Tomasz Krawczyk, Jana Masaríková, Karolina Okrasa
IPEC2