EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Inggeol Lee
dblp:277/1056
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Improved survival analysis by learning shared genomic information from pan-cancer data · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
survival analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Improved survival analysis by learning shared genomic information from pan-cancer data · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › survival analysis
survival prediction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Improved survival analysis by learning shared genomic information from pan-cancer data · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
variational autoencoder |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Improved survival analysis by learning shared genomic information from pan-cancer data · Bioinform. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational autoencoder · 0.4transfer learning · 0.4fine-tuning · 0.4cox proportional hazards · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Evaluation of crowdsourced mortality prediction models as a framework for assessing artificial intelligence in medicineabstractOBJECTIVE: Applications of machine learning in healthcare are of high interest and have the potential to improve patient care. Yet, the real-world accuracy of these models in clinical practice and on different patient subpopulations remains unclear. To address these important questions, we hosted a community challenge to evaluate methods that predict healthcare outcomes. We focused on the prediction of all-cause mortality as the community challenge question. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a Model-to-Data framework, 345 registered participants, coalescing into 25 independent teams, spread over 3 continents and 10 countries, generated 25 accurate models all trained on a dataset of over 1.1 million patients and evaluated on patients prospectively collected over a 1-year observation of a large health system. RESULTS: The top performing team achieved a final area under the receiver operator curve of 0.947 (95% CI, 0.942-0.951) and an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.487 (95% CI, 0.458-0.499) on a prospectively collected patient cohort. DISCUSSION: Post hoc analysis after the challenge revealed that models differ in accuracy on subpopulations, delineated by race or gender, even when they are trained on the same data. CONCLUSION: This is the largest community challenge focused on the evaluation of state-of-the-art machine learning methods in a healthcare system performed to date, revealing both opportunities and pitfalls of clinical AI. Timothy Bergquist, Thomas Schaffter, Thomas Yu, Justin Prosser, Jifan Gao, Guanhua Chen 0002, Lukasz Charzewski, Zofia Nawalany, Ivan Brugere, Renata Retkute, Alidivinas Prusokas, Augustinas Prusokas, Yonghwa Choi, Junseok Choe, Inggeol Lee, Sunkyu Kim, Jaewoo Kang, Sean D. Mooney, Justin Guinney |
J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc. | 17 |
| 2021 | "Killing Me" Is Not a Spoiler: Spoiler Detection Model using Graph Neural Networks with Dependency Relation-Aware Attention MechanismabstractSeveral machine learning-based spoiler detection models have been proposed recently to protect users from spoilers on review websites.Although dependency relations between context words are important for detecting spoilers, current attention-based spoiler detection models are insufficient for utilizing dependency relations.To address this problem, we propose a new spoiler detection model called SDGNN that is based on syntax-aware graph neural networks.In the experiments on two realworld benchmark datasets, we show that our SDGNN outperforms the existing spoiler detection models. Buru Chang, Inggeol Lee, Hyunjae Kim, Jaewoo Kang |
EACL | 2 |
| 2020 | Improved survival analysis by learning shared genomic information from pan-cancer dataabstractMOTIVATION: Recent advances in deep learning have offered solutions to many biomedical tasks. However, there remains a challenge in applying deep learning to survival analysis using human cancer transcriptome data. As the number of genes, the input variables of survival model, is larger than the amount of available cancer patient samples, deep-learning models are prone to overfitting. To address the issue, we introduce a new deep-learning architecture called VAECox. VAECox uses transfer learning and fine tuning. RESULTS: We pre-trained a variational autoencoder on all RNA-seq data in 20 TCGA datasets and transferred the trained weights to our survival prediction model. Then we fine-tuned the transferred weights during training the survival model on each dataset. Results show that our model outperformed other previous models such as Cox Proportional Hazard with LASSO and ridge penalty and Cox-nnet on the 7 of 10 TCGA datasets in terms of C-index. The results signify that the transferred information obtained from entire cancer transcriptome data helped our survival prediction model reduce overfitting and show robust performance in unseen cancer patient samples. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our implementation of VAECox is available at https://github.com/dmis-lab/VAECox. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Sunkyu Kim, Keonwoo Kim 0002, Junseok Choe, Inggeol Lee, Jaewoo Kang |
Bioinform. | 4 |