Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mangpo Phitchaya Phothilimtha
dblp:277/1283
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Compilers and program optimization · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training › distributed training systems
device placement |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Transferable Graph Optimizers for ML Compilers · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Transferable Graph Optimizers for ML Compilers · NeurIPS 2020 |
Compilers and program optimization › compiler optimization
computation graph optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Transferable Graph Optimizers for ML Compilers · NeurIPS 2020 |
Compilers and program optimization › compiler optimization
machine learning for compiler optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Transferable Graph Optimizers for ML Compilers · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sequential attention · 0.9graph neural network · 0.9deep reinforcement learning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Transferable Graph Optimizers for ML CompilersabstractMost compilers for machine learning (ML) frameworks need to solve many correlated optimization problems to generate efficient machine code. Current ML compilers rely on heuristics based algorithms to solve these optimization problems one at a time. However, this approach is not only hard to maintain but often leads to sub-optimal solutions especially for newer model architectures. Existing learning based approaches in the literature are sample inefficient, tackle a single optimization problem, and do not generalize to unseen graphs making them infeasible to be deployed in practice. To address these limitations, we propose an end-to-end, transferable deep reinforcement learning method for computational graph optimization (GO), based on a scalable sequential attention mechanism over an inductive graph neural network. GO generates decisions on the entire graph rather than on each individual node autoregressively, drastically speeding up the search compared to prior methods. Moreover, we propose recurrent attention layers to jointly optimize dependent graph optimization tasks and demonstrate 33%-60% speedup on three graph optimization tasks compared to TensorFlow default optimization. On a diverse set of representative graphs consisting of up to 80,000 nodes, including Inception-v3, Transformer-XL, and WaveNet, GO achieves on average 21% improvement over human experts and 18% improvement over the prior state of the art with 15x faster convergence, on a device placement task evaluated in real systems. Yanqi Zhou, Sudip Roy 0002, AmirAli Abdolrashidi, Daniel Wong 0001, Peter C. Ma, Qiumin Xu, Hanxiao Liu, Mangpo Phitchaya Phothilimtha, Anna Goldie, Azalia Mirhoseini, James Laudon |
NeurIPS | 8 |