Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gregor Geigle

dblp:277/1399 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 5 first-author · 8 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
Vision and language · 38% Trustworthy machine learning · 20% Efficient and distributed learning · 13%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model › vision-language foundation model
multilingual vision-language models
0.912025
Centurio: On Drivers of Multilingual Ability of Large Vision-Language Model · ACL (1) 2025
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
fine-grained image classification
0.812024
African or European Swallow? Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models for Fine-Grained Object Classification · EMNLP 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual grounding
object grounding
0.812024
Does Object Grounding Really Reduce Hallucination of Large Vision-Language Models? · EMNLP 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
vision-language model evaluation
0.812024
African or European Swallow? Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models for Fine-Grained Object Classification · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › hallucination
vision-language model hallucination
0.812024
Does Object Grounding Really Reduce Hallucination of Large Vision-Language Models? · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › zero-shot learning
zero-shot classification
0.812024
Babel-ImageNet: Massively Multilingual Evaluation of Vision-and-Language Representations · ACL (1) 2024
Image and video processing
image restoration
0.812024
InstructIR: High-Quality Image Restoration Following Human Instructions · ECCV (36) 2024
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › natural language semantics › figurative language processing
figurative language detection
0.612022
FigMemes: A Dataset for Figurative Language Identification in Politically-Opinionated Memes · EMNLP 2022
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal understanding
multimodal meme understanding
0.612022
FigMemes: A Dataset for Figurative Language Identification in Politically-Opinionated Memes · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.612022
FigMemes: A Dataset for Figurative Language Identification in Politically-Opinionated Memes · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › distribution shift
robustness to distribution shift
0.612022
FigMemes: A Dataset for Figurative Language Identification in Politically-Opinionated Memes · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.512021
AdapterDrop: On the Efficiency of Adapters in Transformers · EMNLP (1) 2021
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning
0.512021
AdapterDrop: On the Efficiency of Adapters in Transformers · EMNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › multilingual NLP
multilingual language modeling
0.312025
Centurio: On Drivers of Multilingual Ability of Large Vision-Language Model · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction following
0.212024
InstructIR: High-Quality Image Restoration Following Human Instructions · ECCV (36) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multi-task inference
0.112021
AdapterDrop: On the Efficiency of Adapters in Transformers · EMNLP (1) 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.112021
AdapterDrop: On the Efficiency of Adapters in Transformers · EMNLP (1) 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

language model · 1.5instruction tuning · 1.5CLIP · 1.5multilingual evaluation · 0.9large vision-language model training · 0.9wordnet synsets · 0.8visual question answering · 0.8negative label mining · 0.8multiple-choice benchmark · 0.8image captioning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Centurio: On Drivers of Multilingual Ability of Large Vision-Language Model
abstract
Gregor Geigle, Florian Schneider, Carolin Holtermann, Chris Biemann, Radu Timofte, Anne Lauscher, Goran Glavaš. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Gregor Geigle, Florian Schneider 0001, Carolin Holtermann, Chris Biemann, Radu Timofte, Anne Lauscher, Goran Glavas
ACL (1)1
2024 Babel-ImageNet: Massively Multilingual Evaluation of Vision-and-Language Representations
abstract
Vision-and-language (VL) models with separate encoders for each modality (e.g., CLIP) have become the go-to models for zero-shot image classification and image-text retrieval.They are, however, mostly evaluated in English as multilingual benchmarks are limited in availability.We introduce Babel-ImageNet, a massively multilingual benchmark that offers (partial) translations of ImageNet labels to 100 languages, built without machine translation or manual annotation.We instead automatically obtain reliable translations by linking them -via shared WordNet synsets -to Babel-Net, a massively multilingual lexico-semantic network.We evaluate 11 public multilingual CLIP models on zero-shot image classification (ZS-IC) on our benchmark, demonstrating a significant gap between English ImageNet performance and that of high-resource languages (e.g., German or Chinese), and an even bigger gap for low-resource languages (e.g., Sinhala or Lao).Crucially, we show that the models' ZS-IC performance highly correlates with their performance in image-text retrieval, validating the use of Babel-ImageNet to evaluate multilingual models for the vast majority of languages without gold image-text data.Finally, we show that the performance of multilingual CLIP can be drastically improved for low-resource languages with parameter-efficient languagespecific training.We make our code and data publicly available
Gregor Geigle, Radu Timofte, Goran Glavas
ACL (1)1
2024 InstructIR: High-Quality Image Restoration Following Human Instructions
Marcos V. Conde, Gregor Geigle, Radu Timofte
ECCV (36)2
2024 African or European Swallow? Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models for Fine-Grained Object Classification
abstract
Recent Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) demonstrate impressive abilities on numerous image understanding and reasoning tasks.The task of fine-grained object classification (e.g., distinction between animal species), however, has been probed insufficiently, despite its downstream importance.We fill this evaluation gap by creating FOCI (Fine-grained Object ClassIfication), a difficult multiple-choice benchmark for fine-grained object classification, from existing object classification datasets: (1) multiple-choice avoids ambiguous answers associated with casting classification as open-ended QA task; (2) we retain classification difficulty by mining negative labels with a CLIP model.FOCI complements five popular classification datasets with four domain-specific subsets from ImageNet-21k.We benchmark 12 public LVLMs on FOCI and show that it tests for a complementary skill to established image understanding and reasoning benchmarks.Crucially, CLIP models exhibit dramatically better performance than LVLMs.Since the image encoders of LVLMs come from these CLIP models, this points to inadequate alignment for fine-grained object distinction between the encoder and the LLM and warrants (pre)training data with more fine-grained annotation.We release our code at https:// github.com/gregor-ge/FOCI-Benchmark.
Gregor Geigle, Radu Timofte, Goran Glavas
EMNLP1
2024 Does Object Grounding Really Reduce Hallucination of Large Vision-Language Models?
abstract
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have recently dramatically pushed the state of the art in image captioning and many image understanding tasks (e.g., visual question answering).LVLMs, however, often hallucinate and produce captions that mention concepts that cannot be found in the image.These hallucinations erode the trustworthiness of LVLMs and are arguably among the main obstacles to their ubiquitous adoption.Recent work suggests that addition of grounding objectives-those that explicitly align image regions or objects to text spans-reduces the amount of LVLM hallucination.Although intuitive, this claim is not empirically justified as the reduction effects have been established, we argue, with flawed evaluation protocols that (i) rely on data (i.e., MSCOCO) that has been extensively used in LVLM training and (ii) measure hallucination via question answering rather than open-ended caption generation.In this work, in contrast, we offer the first systematic analysis of the effect of fine-grained object grounding on LVLM hallucination under an evaluation protocol that more realistically captures LVLM hallucination in open generation.Our extensive experiments over three backbone LLMs reveal that grounding objectives have little to no effect on object hallucination in open caption generation."A white hound and a cat looking at the camera" "A white hound and a cat looking at the camera"
Gregor Geigle, Radu Timofte, Goran Glavas
EMNLP1
2022 FigMemes: A Dataset for Figurative Language Identification in Politically-Opinionated Memes
abstract
Real-world politically-opinionated memes often rely on figurative language to cloak propaganda and radical ideas to help them spread.It is not only a scientific challenge to develop machine learning models to recognize them in memes, but also sociologically beneficial to understand hidden meanings at scale and raise awareness.These memes are fast-evolving (in both topics and visuals) and it remains unclear whether current multimodal machine learning models are robust to such distribution shifts.To enable future research into this area, we first present FigMemes, a dataset for figurative language classification in politically-opinionated memes. 1 We evaluate the performance of state-of-the-art unimodal and multimodal models and provide comprehensive benchmark results.The key contributions of this proposed dataset include annotations of six commonly used types of figurative language in politicallyopinionated memes, and a wide range of topics and visual styles.We also provide analyses on the ability of multimodal models to generalize across distribution shifts in memes.Our dataset poses unique machine learning challenges and our results show that current models have significant room for improvement in both performance and robustness to distribution shifts.The code and dataset (including splits we used for analyses) are available at: https://github. com/UKPLab/emnlp2022-figmemes.
Gregor Geigle, Robin Krebs, Iryna Gurevych
EMNLP2
2022 Retrieve Fast, Rerank Smart: Cooperative and Joint Approaches for Improved Cross-Modal Retrieval
abstract
Abstract Current state-of-the-art approaches to cross- modal retrieval process text and visual input jointly, relying on Transformer-based architectures with cross-attention mechanisms that attend over all words and objects in an image. While offering unmatched retrieval performance, such models: 1) are typically pretrained from scratch and thus less scalable, 2) suffer from huge retrieval latency and inefficiency issues, which makes them impractical in realistic applications. To address these crucial gaps towards both improved and efficient cross- modal retrieval, we propose a novel fine-tuning framework that turns any pretrained text-image multi-modal model into an efficient retrieval model. The framework is based on a cooperative retrieve-and-rerank approach that combines: 1) twin networks (i.e., a bi-encoder) to separately encode all items of a corpus, enabling efficient initial retrieval, and 2) a cross-encoder component for a more nuanced (i.e., smarter) ranking of the retrieved small set of items. We also propose to jointly fine- tune the two components with shared weights, yielding a more parameter-efficient model. Our experiments on a series of standard cross-modal retrieval benchmarks in monolingual, multilingual, and zero-shot setups, demonstrate improved accuracy and huge efficiency benefits over the state-of-the-art cross- encoders.1
Gregor Geigle, Jonas Pfeiffer, Nils Reimers 0001, Ivan Vulic, Iryna Gurevych
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics1
2021 AdapterDrop: On the Efficiency of Adapters in Transformers
abstract
Transformer models are expensive to fine-tune, slow for inference, and have large storage requirements.Recent approaches tackle these shortcomings by training smaller models, dynamically reducing the model size, and by training light-weight adapters.In this paper, we propose AdapterDrop, removing adapters from lower transformer layers during training and inference, which incorporates concepts from all three directions.We show that Adap-terDrop can dynamically reduce the computational overhead when performing inference over multiple tasks simultaneously, with minimal decrease in task performances.We further prune adapters from AdapterFusion, which improves the inference efficiency while maintaining the task performances entirely.
Andreas Rücklé, Gregor Geigle, Max Glockner, Tilman Beck, Jonas Pfeiffer, Nils Reimers 0001, Iryna Gurevych
EMNLP (1)2