Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vladimir Kryzhanovskiy
dblp:277/3438
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0005-5339-8280ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 91% Deep learning architectures and training · 9% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Channel Balancing for Accurate Quantization of Winograd Convolutions · CVPR 2022 QPP: Real-Time Quantization Parameter Prediction for Deep Neural Networks · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
quantization |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Channel Balancing for Accurate Quantization of Winograd Convolutions · CVPR 2022 QPP: Real-Time Quantization Parameter Prediction for Deep Neural Networks · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model quantization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Quantization-Friendly Winograd Transformations for Convolutional Neural Networks · ECCV (58) 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › quantization
quantization-aware training |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Channel Balancing for Accurate Quantization of Winograd Convolutions · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › quantization
post-training quantization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | QPP: Real-Time Quantization Parameter Prediction for Deep Neural Networks · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network |
0.4 | 2 | 2024 | Quantization-Friendly Winograd Transformations for Convolutional Neural Networks · ECCV (58) 2024 Channel Balancing for Accurate Quantization of Winograd Convolutions · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › inference acceleration
winograd convolution |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Channel Balancing for Accurate Quantization of Winograd Convolutions · CVPR 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
winograd transformation · 0.8quantization · 0.8post-training quantization · 0.6channel balancing · 0.6calibration · 0.6quantization parameter prediction · 0.5dense+sparse quantization · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Quantization-Friendly Winograd Transformations for Convolutional Neural Networks
Vladimir Protsenko, Vladimir Kryzhanovskiy, Alexander Filippov |
ECCV (58) | 2 |
| 2022 | Channel Balancing for Accurate Quantization of Winograd ConvolutionsabstractIt is well known that Winograd convolution algorithms speed up the widely used small-size convolutions. However, the problem of quantization of Winograd convolutions is challenging - while quantization of slower Winograd algorithms does not cause problems, quantization of faster Winograd algorithms often leads to a significant drop in the quality of models. We introduce a novel class of Winograd algorithms that balances the filter and input channels in the Winograd domain. Unlike traditional Winograd convolutions, the proposed convolution balances the ranges of input channels on the forward pass by scaling the input tensor using special balancing coefficients (the filter channels are balanced offline). As a result of balancing, the inputs and filters of the Winograd convolution are much easier to quantize. Thus, the proposed technique allows us to obtain models with quantized Winograd convolutions, the quality of which is significantly higher than the quality of models with traditional quantized Winograd convolutions. Moreover, we propose a special direct algorithm for calculating the balancing coefficients, which does not require additional model training. This algorithm makes it easy to obtain the post-training quantized balanced Winograd convolutions - one should just feed a few data samples to the model without training to calibrate special parameters. In addition, it is possible to initialize the balancing coefficients using this algorithm and further train them as trainable variables during Winograd quantization-aware training for greater quality improvement. Vladimir Chikin, Vladimir Kryzhanovskiy |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2021 | QPP: Real-Time Quantization Parameter Prediction for Deep Neural NetworksabstractModern deep neural networks (DNNs) cannot be effectively used in mobile and embedded devices due to strict requirements for computational complexity, memory, and power consumption. The quantization of weights and feature maps (activations) is a popular approach to solve this problem. Training-aware quantization often shows excellent results but requires a full dataset, which is not always available. Post-training quantization methods, in turn, are applied without fine-tuning but still work well for many classes of tasks like classification, segmentation, and so on. However, they either imply a big overhead for quantization parameters (QPs) calculation at runtime (dynamic methods) or lead to an accuracy drop if pre-computed static QPs are used (static methods). Moreover, most inference frame-works don’t support dynamic quantization. Thus we propose a novel quantization approach called QPP: quantization parameter prediction. With a small subset of a training dataset or unlabeled data from the same domain, we find the predictor that can accurately estimate QPs of activations given only the NN’s input data. Such a predictor allows us to avoid complex calculation of precise values of QPs while maintaining the quality of the model. To illustrate our method’s efficiency, we added QPP into two dynamic approaches: 1) Dense+Sparse quantization, where the predetermined percentage of activations are not quantized, 2) standard quantization with equal quantization steps. We provide experiments on a wide set of tasks including super-resolution, facial landmark, segmentation, and classification. Vladimir Kryzhanovskiy, Gleb Balitskiy, Nikolay Kozyrskiy, Aleksandr Zuruev |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2020 | Fast and Lightweight On-Device TTS with Tacotron2 and LPCNet
Vadim Popov, Stanislav Kamenev, Mikhail A. Kudinov, Sergey Repyevsky, Tasnima Sadekova, Vitalii Bushaev, Vladimir Kryzhanovskiy, Denis Parkhomenko |
INTERSPEECH | 7 |