Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Amartya Mitra
dblp:277/5378
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory › over-parameterization
double descent |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Multi-scale Feature Learning Dynamics: Insights for Double Descent · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory › feature learning theory
feature learning dynamics |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Multi-scale Feature Learning Dynamics: Insights for Double Descent · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Multi-scale Feature Learning Dynamics: Insights for Double Descent · ICML 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
teacher-student setup · 0.6linear model analysis · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Multi-scale Feature Learning Dynamics: Insights for Double DescentabstractAn intriguing phenomenon that arises from the high-dimensional learning dynamics of neural networks is the phenomenon of “double descent”. The more commonly studied aspect of this phenomenon corresponds to model-wise double descent where the test error exhibits a second descent with increasing model complexity, beyond the classical U-shaped error curve. In this work, we investigate the origins of the less studied epoch-wise double descent in which the test error undergoes two non-monotonous transitions, or descents as the training time increases. We study a linear teacher-student setup exhibiting epoch-wise double descent similar to that in deep neural networks. In this setting, we derive closed-form analytical expressions describing the generalization error in terms of low-dimensional scalar macroscopic variables. We find that double descent can be attributed to distinct features being learned at different scales: as fast-learning features overfit, slower-learning features start to fit, resulting in a second descent in test error. We validate our findings through numerical simulations where our theory accurately predicts empirical findings and remains consistent with observations in deep neural networks. Mohammad Pezeshki, Amartya Mitra, Yoshua Bengio, Guillaume Lajoie |
ICML | 2 |